• MudMan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    With thinking Facebook sucks? Nothing.

    With thinking Facebook sucks and Facebook’s audience should stay in Facebook while the “fediverse” stays small and exclusive? That it goes against the stated goals of providing decentralized, open social platforms as a replacement for current closed platforms.

          • MudMan@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I said mastodon.social, which is one (very large) instance of the Mastodon service. Those are two different things. It is not obvious and it is confusing, though.

            I ask again if you have a point.

              • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                Yeah I know plenty of instances limit them making follows approval only. I also saw this line on a person’s profile: “if you follow me from mastodon.social I won’t approve your requests, migrate to a different instance”.

                I think the main reason is because mastodon.social has a lot of spam (or has had it in the past) though I’m sure that the threads issue and the fact that they want to federate and encourage federation with threads probably isn’t going to help.

              • MudMan@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Still waiting on that point, gonna stop engaging until you make one. Writing random sentences is not, in fact, making an argument.