• Laticauda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      Because most alternatives aren’t nearly as functional due to them dominating the market.

      • cryptix@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes alternate platforms with good level of UX exists. But without content its no good. YouTube - Peertube Google maps - Organic maps & OSMAnd (open street maps) Reddit - Lemmy (bigger is better)

        • Alex@feddit.ro
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          For the others, maybe. But YouTube? It’s strength is in the sheer amount of content. It’s going to take a lot of time and resources to create and host that content on the fediverse.

    • Nath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      It is frightfully expensive to host video content. YouTube would cost Billions per year to run.

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        I always wonder about this. I pay only a few bucks per month for Nebula. I highly suspect Nebula is running at a loss.

        • Jaigoda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          11 months ago

          Not necessarily. Nebula operates at a far, far smaller scope, with an emphasis on quality of videos over quantity, and every user is a paid user. If every user of YouTube was paying a couple bucks per month, they’d be making in the high tens of billions of dollars of revenue per year, several times more than they do with ads. Plus YouTube has a ridiculously huge amount of essentially worthless videos because literally anyone can upload a 10 hour video, so surely their hosting costs are higher per user than Nebula.

    • zeroxxx@lemmy.my.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      So what is equal or better alternative than Google Maps, Youtube and Google Search?

      • bruhduh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I’ve been using duckduckgo for half a year already they’ve became quite good compared to Google search, Google maps alternative is any popular maps app just try what’ll fit your tastes, but YouTube is certainly don’t have alternatives YET just because libre alternatives though exist but not yet in shape enough (basically we need datahoarders who’ll hoard and host whole youtube to libre alternatives such as framatube and others) for now we can only rely to custom frontends such as clipious, piped and others and custom apps of course

      • ryan_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I started ditching google apps last spring and my “alternatives” are: bing/apple maps, invidious, and SearXNG. I self-host the last two to keep even more control of my data.

      • archchan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        OpenStreetMap instead of Google Maps (OSM would be even better if more people used and actively contributed mapping data to it), no real youtube alternative yet (but see Piped/Invidious, Peertube, and Odysee), and there’s plenty of alternative search engines like Duckduckgo, Brave search (has its own index), etc

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Revealed preferences. As much as people won’t admit it, these services do provide legitimate value, and they also cost a lot of money to operate.