RNGesus@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前Cryptoflationlemmy.worldimagemessage-square98fedilinkarrow-up11.75Karrow-down127
arrow-up11.72Karrow-down1imageCryptoflationlemmy.worldRNGesus@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square98fedilink
minus-squareSuckMyWang@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·1 年前The real question is why is a post about conditions that are 2 years old, getting so much traction now when it appears the opposite is relevant?
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 年前Because inflation is still high and crypto is still volatile.
minus-squareZorque@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 年前Because they’re indicative of general economic conditions.
minus-squareSuckMyWang@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前Not really, bitcoin was trending sideways before the banking crisis. If anything bitcoin solidified its reversal when this happened. So it did the opposite of what would normally cause poor general economic conditions
The real question is why is a post about conditions that are 2 years old, getting so much traction now when it appears the opposite is relevant?
Because inflation is still high and crypto is still volatile.
Because they’re indicative of general economic conditions.
Not really, bitcoin was trending sideways before the banking crisis. If anything bitcoin solidified its reversal when this happened. So it did the opposite of what would normally cause poor general economic conditions