I would like to know if I can feel safe here, or if I should pack it up and start looking elsewhere sooner rather than later.

If the kbin staff have already made there intentions clear, please let me know.

  • Rabbithole@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    If this were just some problematic instance (or a group of them, even) I’d entirely agree with you, but this is Facebook, the damage that they’re almost certainly planning and are entirely capable of requires (at least in my opinion), a different solution.

    Please note that I’m suggesting this as an entirely unusual solution to a very unusual problem. Not as some sort of standard practice.

    • masterspace@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You haven’t articulated a problem, let alone described how this particular solution solves it. Meta building a better version of your platform that siphons away users is a problem regardless of whether or not you federate with them / regardless of whether their platform is even built to support activitypub. Federation has no bearing on that one way or another.

      • all-knight-party@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t want content stemming from a place that’s controlled by advertisers and other large companies. If we’re federated with Meta then that means your decentralized independent instance would still have advertiser driven, heavily capitalist and consumer manipulative content domineering and running through its veins.

        That’s a specific thing that I’ve read many people enjoy getting away from when it comes to joining the Fediverse.