• CrunchyBoy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the “undeniable beauty” bit was a joke.

    I think she has a good point at the end. Lots of us think we have skills that can’t be replicated by a machine, but companies would rather have something replicated poorly by a machine if it saves them money.

    • ClassyDave@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of course they would, that’s the point of the company! Companies don’t align with our needs as humans. Ideally we’d have more free time due to advancements and automation, but our corporate overlords think we should just work more actually. And old people who got theirs don’t think anyone should have it easy since they didn’t.

      • CrunchyBoy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        True, but I meant to emphasize that the quality of the work is not as important as some people might think. For a lot of bosses the work quality from a machine only needs to be passable, not good. So while one might say “AI would suck at my job, I’m safe” they might need to be worried.