• Zabjam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, becoming an outlaw would change nothing for the better. Quite contrary actually. Police could go even worse on you without any consequences but now you would also have to worry about everyone else being able to fuck you over with zero consequences for them.

    And yes, being an outlaw would mean you don’t participate. Why would society grant you benefits like providing service that cost a lot of money (e.g. infrastructure) while you sit back and say “fuck you, give me your shit”

    • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So the benefits of society are inextricable linked with accepting their protection racket? Just being clear here, this isn’t you know, textbook extortion? If I criticize capitalism, does that mean I’m criticizing America as a whole or is there more to America and life inside it than the economic laws we passed? One can exist without the other…we see capitalism in other countries… Does that mean other countries are America…? Or maybe that that’s a stupid conflagration. Stupidly common too.

      There’s nothing stopping police from actively ruining and derailing your entire life now. They’ll do it just for the lolz. It’s overpaid institutionalized malice granted immunity. And what do they do with this honor? Wanton murder and subjugation and have become the largest mob stealing the most from the citizens that the countries ever seen or known.

      Ask me how I know

      I’d happily pay the estimated $75 per person a year for the military. Since that’s half the congressional budget I’ll just attach the other $75 in a blank check. In fact in my preferred world we’d be able to sign off or on and single line item of the budget individually. But that works be government by persuasion not coercion.

      And we should have to go thru the motions of paying our own taxes. If you believe in personal property, y’know, just straight up ownership, then no one, and I mean no one, has the right to your money unless it’s thru you. Maybe it’s me. Maybe I simply think that respectful society should act respectfully.

      And yes, thank you for such concerns but I really do feel much safer taking my own security into my own hands, utilizing and practicing my own agency, probably because it’s the only security any of us actually have, or will likely know. The police aren’t our protectors. Ask the kids in Uvalde. The police protect private property of those that donate to them and abuse the application of the law to such a degree that respecting it doesn’t even REGISTER in the brain. No one respects the law. Some FEAR the law, but that is not respect. More so, the law is openly flaunted on national TV by corporations and by politicians. A fine not as big as the illicit gains? Cost of business, rinse, repeat. As much freedom as you can afford, just pad every pocket on the way. Corruption=the American way.

      You want to be rich? Mimic their behavior. Lovely society we live in, huh? And who would’ve thought, that breaking the public trust, with no accountability, would just pave the way for Blade Runner. There’s your psychotic motherfuckers that need religion to not rape. Punch up, fools, before you cant anymore. Look to this post. THEY BROKE THE SOCIAL CONTRACT, my allegiance to their, to ANY fucking cause isn’t unconditional. Life itself, IS CONDITIONAL.

    • mayoi@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why would society grant you benefits like providing service that cost a lot of money (e.g. infrastructure) while you sit back and say “fuck you, give me your shit”

      Society doesn’t mind doing this for refugees who not only said fuck you to their own country, but also yours.

      But of course, it would be quite intolerant to tell refugees to go back and fix their shitty country instead of leeching from yours.

      • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Actually, society treats refugees quite harshly in almost any country. It’s really only right wing propaganda that pushes the concept that any country just accepts refugees with open arms while they pillage a new country.

        Guess we know where you get your information from

        • mayoi@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          idpol concern trolling

          You can find how many jobless refugees are in Germany right now on Google. Is Google a right-wing propaganda machine now?

          • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Google is an unbiased search engine. You can find almost any piece of information that confirms your own bias.

            I guess we can add dishonest to the list?

            • RichCaffeineFlavor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Google is a straight up propaganda platform. It’s almost impossible to get it to give you information that doesn’t center the interests of the US foreign policy blob. It may be you’ve never been exposed to the perspectives that are being censored but I promise you it’s anything but unbiased.

            • mayoi@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I see, official government statistics are biased… Let me guess, Hitler was alive all along and did this?

              • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ah yes, attacking the character of a person you don’t know. Hallmark of a winner right there.

                Let me reiterate that, by your own logic, I don’t owe you any kind of explanation. Attack me all you like. Logical conversations are for people who abide the social contract

                • mayoi@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Ah yes, attacking the character of a person you don’t know.

                  You didn’t have a problem with this when you were the one doing it.