His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court’s decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.

  • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I feel like framing the issue like this kinda dangerous. If a single entity (in this case, a business) is allowed to discriminate against a protected class, then are all businesses that provide that service allowed to discriminate against said class?

    It seems as though they would be. That gets us back to a version of the Jim Crow South pretty quickly. How are LGBTQ+ folks supposed to exist as equal members in a society if entire segments of that society are legally allowed to close themselves off? What happens when a business that controls major segments of more important service sectors makes a similar decision (for example, say the only Level 1 trauma center in a city is in a privately-owned, religiously-affiliated medical center that now has a legal precedent to say they won’t serve LGBTQ+ patients for religious reasons)?

    • Not_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      You can take anything and make it horrifying if you want. It’s either a slippery slope or reductio ad absurdum.

      This is a photographer that wanted to decline a customer, nothing more or less.

      A business should be able to decide the kind of services it provides. If I don’t want to bake a gigantic 5’ swastika cake I shouldn’t have to.

      At the end of the day capitalism protects everyone against excessive descrimination - business that reject people get less money, fewer reviews, will grow slower, etc. If that business rejects your business someone else will provide it. If nobody serves a community, there’s a business opportunity waiting. Etc.

      I don’t know how delusional you need to be to assume it could EVER be possible that somehow every business would just refuse to serve a population because of X characteristic.