• HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dont know what game you played where everyone expected things to go according to plan, but plans never survive long for anyone, DM or players

    I didnt, I’m referring to the attitude you see in posts like this. Like, in the OP, the fictional GM is picking up the ball and going home because the fictional player is doing something zany. And in the other comments, just take a look at em. There’s a pretty clear air of disdain for that kind of behavior, like its bad manners to do things “clever” in an RPG.

    Without the chaos of player agency, you’ve pretty much just got low quality fiction without any sort of deviation from the course. And I dont know about you, but I dont think thats particularly compelling, dramatic, or memorable. Antics can be messy, but thats kind of the point.

    Eh, but maybe its because I dont play with PUGs anymore. It’s been years since ive played with anyone I could consider a problem player, so maybe ive just lost perspective.

    • sammytheman666@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Heh. A lot of problems also come from the DM not saying no enough. Too much is like not enough. Not saying no every is bad. Saying no too much is bad. Balance like in everything is how you get a great game.

      Nah, I haven’t checked the comments, and following what you said I won’t.

    • Jorgelino@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I see it as the DM realising the items he gave the players are too OP and deciding to remove them. A bit clunky, but reasonable depending on the item, imo.

      I would’ve thought from your previous rant, that you’d be against players having too many OP items, as that can easily lead to the situation you described where everyone always succeeds and there’s no “desperate struggle”, as you put it.