Discord will switch to temporary file links to block malware delivery::Discord will switch to temporary file links for all users by the end of the year to block attackers from using its CDN (content delivery network) for hosting and pushing malware.

  • gridleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    197
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Can we please stop building everything around Discord? It has its place as a chat app, but it’s become like a web parallel to our own, except owned and operated by a single company. It’s an information black hole, completely closed off from the rest of the web, unscrapeable, uncrawlable, unarchiveable, and borderline unsearchable. It has everything that is wrong with the web today. When the company dies, all information in the app dies with it. There’s no Internet Archive for Discord.

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree. It’s a handy chat app but it’s not a replacement for actual forums and, God forbid, an actual support page for a project.

    • Kayn@dormi.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is not easy when everyone you know is already on Discord.

      The network effect is active in full force here.

      • Sparking@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Its a good point. Eventually discord will find some way to enshittify, I am sure.

          • Sparking@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I guess that is what they are doing, but this particular change seems pretty reasonable to me. Discord can’t simultaneously be a chat application and a repository for all memes for all time.

            Just goes to show that VC funded services are not sustainable infrastructure for anyone.

    • Salzkrebs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      My university forces its students to use Discord for computer science. They even forced me to use my real name (otherwise they would’ve kicked me from the channel). It’s a privacy nightmare so I hope they will switch now since they were using it to host weekly exams.

    • ITALIEN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Admittedly I really like Discord’s user interface. Love the servers that can be organized by channel and channel type, have permissions sets for different roles, etc. All that good shit. What I don’t like is the total control of one entity and lack of privacy. I’ve been looking at Matrix but it still has a ways to go before I could ever think of completely dropping Discord.

      • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️@7.62x54r.ru
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think at a minimum someone would need to create a semi automated client for Matrix that would have a better interface and then handle the technical changes and configuration automatically. Spaces can use used a “servers” but it involves creating rooms and then adding them and the process is complicated.

    • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️@7.62x54r.ru
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Technically someone could just make a headless browser and then scrape everything that way, Advancements in AI will make headless browsing easier and companies like Facebook won’t be able to block automation by changing the HTML multiple times per day.

    • Nobsi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      What are you talking about?
      It’s literally a chat app. If all discord servers die today, nothing of value will be lost.

      • waitmarks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        unfortunately no, there are several communities where if i ask for some specific information, i am told to go onto the discord because there are guides and information there. specifically, i have noticed this a lot with mechanical keyboard communities, but i know it’s happening elsewhere too. I simply don’t understand it myself, trying to find something on these is like trying to find something in a twitch stream. it’s infuriating.

        • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          So, so many modding projects live entirely on discord. I hate having to join a server just to download a single goddamn mod, and then you can’t find any info about them because google can’t index the discussions.

          • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️@7.62x54r.ru
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Technically with headless browsing, nothing can’t be indexed. That is at least unless people start getting brain implant and then Big Tech gets to control everything you experience and there’s no analog gap where things can be copied.

        • iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s better flat out. Centralization isn’t evil in an of itself. The dogma pushed in this comment section is hilarious.

          • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️@7.62x54r.ru
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It creates a single point of failure if the administration ever goes bad.

            The “server” nomenclature is also misleading. It’s not a big deal and I think it works pretty well for what it’s supposed to convey.

  • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    172
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah… In sure malware is the reason. It’s not that they don’t want people using discord for file hosting.

    • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      109
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Still, it’s not a file hosting platform. 🤷‍♂️ it should have been temporary to begin with.

          • echo64@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            you think a service you pay for that lets you upload files to them, to share the files with an unlimited amount of other people, is not a file hosting platform? even though it hosts files for you? and you pay for the service?

            what do you think it is?

            • WorseDoughnut 🍩@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Don’t move the goal posts. It’s 100% not an advertised feature to use Discord uploads as cloud storage or an off-platform CDN.

              The unintended side effect that you’ve so clearly described is the exact reason they’re implementing the protections in question.

        • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          What ? Pretty sure their paid plans only allow uploading larger files. It says nothing about the longevity of said files on their servers

        • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          29
          ·
          1 year ago

          It shouldn’t have been. That’s their bad—misuse of file hosting is an obvious result of offering file hosting. Manage your own files. Put them on GitHub or something. And if they’re private they shouldn’t be on any cloud to begin with 🤷‍♂️

          • wildginger
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            36
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            … But it is, and they offer for people to pay them in order to function as such.

            “Kroger shouldnt sell groceries. 🤷‍♀️ Grow your own celery, if you intended to eat it and not sell it you shouldnt have bought it from a store to begin with.”

              • wildginger
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                They literally were selling that. That was the thing they flaunted as a big reason to pay up, was the permanence of the file storage.

                If they werent aware of that, or its effect on their sales, I would be genuinely shocked. That would be like mcdonalds being surprised people wanted fries with their combo meal.

                • Kayn@dormi.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Surely you can quote where the permance of file storage “was the thing they flaunted as a big reason to pay up”.

                  And no, a mere mention of increased upload sizes is not enough.

            • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              That comparison is poor. Kroger is a store for groceries. If DropBox started saying files were temporary, I’d think that was ridiculous. Discord should have always required a third party storage solution for longer term storage. They’re a chat app. Like zoom. And zoom provides integration with cloud file services.

              • wildginger
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Discord is a free chat app that offered a paid service of file storage. Because they arent actually trying to be a chat app.

                They are trying to be a community hub. A hub that offers the bare minimum for a community for free, with paid upgrades to community care, communication, interaction, and convenience.

                Which included file storage. Which is why so many people chose them for their community hub.

                • WorseDoughnut 🍩@lemdro.id
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  that offered a paid service of file storage

                  This is just patently false, so you’re either completely clueless or are being dishonest to stir up outrage.

      • wildginger
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They wouldnt have been as popular if they had been temporary from the beginning.

        Shoulda woulda coulda, this is now a thing their community has come to expect and rely on their platform being capable of. And the change of such will break a number of channels.

        • darth_helmet@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Eh if they don’t want people using their service that way, that’s their right. People who care about it that much should host a matrix instance.

              • Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Ignoring the fact that they were clearly talking in orders of magnitude, it was 8MB for a very long time and only recently got increased to 25.

                • Rentlar@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’d only recently noticed the change, because my multipicture and short video sends were failing less often.

              • echo64@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Fine, free gets you 20 floppy disks worth!! Omg, so useful. Four second heavil compressed reaction mp4s might fit fine. Don’t go more than ten.

                If I’m measuring it in two handfuls of floppy disks in 2023, then its not a lot. That’s your hint that I’m measuring it in !980s technology.

                • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There’s no daily limit mate, you’re free to upload as many files as you want.

                  Just not at once.

          • lostmypasswordanew@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This is typical enshittification. Make an impossibly good service to gain marketshare. Then make it worse once you’ve eliminated all competition and dominate the market.

              • wildginger
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                If their plan was to intentionally make unsustainable investments and then gut features later on, they should be shuttered now before they waste any more users time and money

                • diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Initial investments are usually excessively big to secure your position. The main focus isn’t to balance the budget, but to have as many earnings and growth as possible to then get rid of the defficit

          • wildginger
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Did anything about my comment imply I thought this change was illegal? This has nothing to do with their rights

            The issue at hand is taking away a feature your users have come to expect from your product after youve secured a level of dependance by outcompeting the competition

            • darth_helmet@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I didn’t intend to imply that, my statement can be rephrased as “if users don’t like this change, they should use an alternative, because discord is going to do what makes sense to discord.” File hosting is ubiquitous and cheap, so it isn’t a big deal. I don’t work at discord, but I do work at a company that has file hosting as one of its features, and combating malicious misuse of that feature is expensive and a pain in the ass. If I could get away with not offering file hosting, I’d be tempted to remove it.

              • wildginger
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Do you think your company could get away with offering a paid service that included file hosting, and then suddenly announcing that the file hosting was now only temporary?

                Or would you expect your customers to abandon you over any claims of “just find an alternative”?

                E: to clarify, by “your company” I mean where you work. Im not assuming youre at a position of ownership

                • darth_helmet@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The services are way too different to compare that feature in isolation, unfortunately. But discord’s business model is not to be a cdn, and I think it’s a good move to occasionally prune a feature that doesn’t provide enough juice for the squeeze. We’ve seen much worse enshittification this year, and I doubt this move has any measurable effect on their active users. Dealing with getting your servers off of blacklists because some douche decided to host malware on your free file hosting isn’t how anyone wants to spend their days, I assure you.

    • lea@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 year ago

      Files are still stored permanently and links inside the client stay permanent as well, only links accessed externally are affected. I don’t like Discord either but anyone relying on it as their personal free CDN had it coming for them.