• bouh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Warlock is given the power too. You wouldn’t be able to bargain your spellslots back of it didn’t come from your patron.

    Also, if it was knowledge based, you’d use your intelligence, not your charisma.

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Warlock was apparently meant to be an INT-based caster in 5e, apparently the grognards didn’t like change so they reverted it after the dndnext playtest (but forgot to change all the starting proficiencies!) It makes more sense for the “mad mage who studied the forbidden magicks” archetype though.

      • 1simpletailer@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Man 5e really needs another INT caster and has too many CHA casters too. Every party is full of charismatic dumbfucks which I guess fits with how most players play.

        • smeg@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The trouble is that there’s basically no downside to dumping INT, it’s not like back in the day when things like languages and skill ranks depended on it

      • bouh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, I think the current distribution is far better. A mad mage who studied forbidden magic is a wizard, like all mages who study. A “mage who made a pact with an entity to get power or magic”, by definition, did not studied. A mage who studied and also made a pact can have both classes.

        There is the pact of the tome that emphasise the idea that you can get a magical tome to get spells. You didn’t wrote those spells. You still didn’t learn this magic. What intelligence is there to this craft?