• elscallr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They literally invented MAID so that people with terminal cancer can take the painless path out, but now it’s being discussed for literally anyone who is feeling mentally unwell.

    The people opposed to medically assisted death used this as an argument against it. I disagreed with them, didn’t expect that to really happen.

    I still don’t disagree with its use here. If a person’s life is not their own to take then they have no autonomy at all, but still… it’s jarring to see it actually being used this way.

    • Trantarius@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      If a person’s life is not their own to take then they have no autonomy at all

      That’s just not right. Autonomy isn’t some absolute, all or nothing thing. If it was, then everybody would have “no autonomy at all”, because we’re not allowed to commit crimes.

      Of the full range of possible actions, killing yourself is a relatively small portion of those. Considering that death eliminates all possible future actions, I’d argue that preventing a suicide (of a person that’s not dying anyway) actually preserves more autonomy than the alternative.

      • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes it is and not being allowed to harm innocent people isn’t a violation of your autonomy and never was. Grow the fuck up.

        Considering that death eliminates all possible future actions

        Highly debatable