• SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    As I mentioned earlier, I understand you were being hyperbolic, and I acknowledge that Starfield does feature quests that are more engaging than the generic missions. However, even at its peak, the quest design is of mediocre to subpar quality. The recurring pattern of “travel to location X, eliminate target Y, or retrieve item Z” becomes repetitive. Additionally, the process of reaching these objectives consistently follows the same formula: fast-travel to the nearest point, follow the waypoint marker, enter through the front entrance, navigate through a dungeon that is a copy and paste job, and optionally return to the quest giver.

    I recognize that this issue partially stems from the game’s ambitious scope, but it’s a consequence of spreading resources too thin.

    Discussing the intricacies of quality quest design is a complex topic, and while Starfield’s quests may lack inspiration at times, it’s important to remember that it can still be an enjoyable game. However, when you compare it to titles like Baldur’s Gate 3, Fallout: New Vegas, System Shock 2, Deus Ex, etc, it becomes evident that Bethesda had to make concessions in quest design to accommodate the game’s vast scale. For a prime example of the same studio achieving more with less in terms of questing, one need only look at Oblivion’s Dark Brotherhood questline

    And while removing the radiant quests would have made the problem less agregious, more effort still would have needed to be invested in the handcrafted quests to remedy the problem.