Australian national broadcaster ABC has projected three states voted No, effectively defeating the referendum.

  • ravenford@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Tests based on genetics that lead to different rights”. Again, that sounds alot like the constitutional rights granted to just one family line as head of state. And that genetic line didn’t come from Australia. So which race of humans have primacy in australian law?

    • Pladermp@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s possible to hold both of these beliefs simultaneously:

      • The constitution conferring special rights and privileges on the royal family and their delegates is a bad idea.
      • The constitution conferring special rights and privileges to a subset of people within the country based on race is a bad idea.
      • ravenford@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure but then we must acknowledge one of those unacceptable things is reality, and the other which could have added some equality and balance was rejected, leaving the constitution favoured to one group of people, as society has been structured.