• morrowind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    You don’t and there’s no good way to reconcile my two opinions. I don’t disagree the archive should exist, I’m just saying, manipulating information is a valid reason, but the author’s bullying publishers for mistakes isn’t.

    • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Acknowledging literally every change after any news content is published in any context isn’t bullying anyone.

      It’s the absolute bare minimum to not be a piece of shit.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s an easy way to reconcile them… The opinions are “articles should be backed up to prevent information manipulation, a threat to democracy” and “they should be able to hide their mistakes so they don’t get made fun of”

      You reconcile them by not letting them stealth edit, and you stand up for them when they made an honest mistake and are being blasted for it