We are contacting you regarding a past Prime Video purchase(s). The below content is no longer playable on Prime Video.

In an effort to compensate you for the inconvenience, we have applied a £5.99 Amazon Gift Card to your account. The Gift Card amount is equal to the amount you paid for the Prime Video purchase(s). To apologize for the inconvenience, we’ve also added an Amazon Gift Certificate of £5 to your account. Your Gift Card balance will be automatically applied to your next eligible order. You can view your balance and usage history in Your Account here:

  • dansity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Paying 0.99 per song was how a better user experience? Music piracy was pretty big till Spotify. No service was even close before.

    • FlounderBasket@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      9 months ago

      Being able to easily purchase a single song from a reputable source in the comfort of your home instead of going out to physically buy an entire album and then rip it to your computer was a better user experience, yes. Most users are technologically illiterate, and trying to pirate stuff just lead to them getting viruses.

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Because you were guaranteed that what you were downloading was what it said it was, and was high quality, and would have the correct tagging and album art and all of that.

      It’s been shown repeatedly that a large part of piracy isn’t about cost, it’s about convenience. It was easier to pay $0.99 and get what you wanted when you wanted it, than download 8 files off of Napster and hope that one of them was actually a decent bitrate and was the song the title said it was.

      Back when eMule was a thing, it was super common to spend an entire day downloading a 700MB video file at 5kb/s, only for it to be Fight Club instead of whatever you thought you were downloading. It’s the same thing with music.

      • AliasWyvernspur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s been shown repeatedly that a large part of piracy isn’t about cost, it’s about convenience. It was easier to pay $0.99 and get what you wanted when you wanted it, than download 8 files off of Napster and hope that one of them was actually a decent bitrate and was the song the title said it was.

        “We think there is a fundamental misconception about piracy. Piracy is almost always a service problem and not a pricing problem. If a pirate offers a product anywhere in the world, 24 x 7, purchasable from the convenience of your personal computer, and the legal provider says the product is region-locked, will come to your country 3 months after the US release, and can only be purchased at a brick and mortar store, then the pirate’s service is more valuable.”

        -Gabe Newell

        Sauce: http://web.archive.org/web/20120307035423/http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/114391-Valves-Gabe-Newell-Says-Piracy-Is-a-Service-Problem

      • dansity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Music piracy was big till spotify apprared. iTunes had a limited selection, music remixes, small band stuff were not available. iTunes only had what Sony and some other music distributors supplied. I understand what you are saying but still, piracy was there and iTunes was not primary source. Spotify came and now music piracy is basically limited to high quality audio albums which is a niche market.

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Or, with Napster, the person you’re downloading from signs off when you’re 40% done with the download.

        • fubo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Kazaa/Gnutella era: it says porn on the filename, but there’s no previews and it turns out to be CSAM. Thanks for the trauma, now I’m gonna run shred

    • MamboGator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      On top of what’s already been said about technological literacy and security, I’d like to add that I WANT to support the artists who make things I like but the companies selling their works tend to ruin the experience by trying to squeeze every dime out of you.

      For the last decade or so, digital storefronts have provided a pretty good experience, but it’s starting to get a lot worse as the old companies go public and become beholden to shareholders, or as new companies enter the arena and split up what was once available all in one place.

    • AnonTwo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      If you have the local MP3 file you can do just about anything you want with it. Use it in just about any device. Transfer it anywhere. And never lose it.

      I have Mp3s that are over 20-30 years old and have never needed to get them again.

      And yes I go to piracy almost immediately if I can’t get a local file. Just because of how many different ways i’ve used them over the years.