• anlumo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    We look for people who are passionate about it, whose interest in the subject is deeper than skin deep.

    Doesn’t it hurt those people a lot more when their project nearly inevitably gets shut down?

    I’m still bitter about the project I worked on that got killed at my company three years ago.

    • upstream@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Where I work we haven’t really shut down any projects in the last six years.

      We’ve had some smaller projects which got parked due to shifting priorities, but other than that we’ve shipped everything else.

      But inevitably, over a career in software there will be projects that don’t make it to production for one reason or another.

      Personally I’m very pragmatic about it, but I know people who get very attached to the code they write.

      I’m the kind of guy that is passionate about what I’m doing when I’m doing it, not necessarily for all eternity. I’ve written stuff that I’d be more than happy for someone to come and replace, but the thing about revenue generating systems (most people say “legacy”, but I prefer this term) is that they aren’t always easy to replace.

      I know we’re not all wired that way, and some people find it harder to see an older system get retired. A consultant I use is more attached to my code than I am, for instance.