A Big New Report on American Children Is Out. It’s Horrific.
slate.com
“Protect the children” is a popular modern rallying cry. If only.

NSFW for: Potentially challanging your narrative and worldview.

I recently found this article summarising important findings.

Breaking out of ones own bubble is important. And I would like you to remember this the next time you are at a ballot.

If you really think of the children, vote according to reality.

And if you FEEL personally attacked by this article and bash me in the comments, whataboutism away from the subject or bothsides-ing the issue; Thanks for making my point for me and seek help.

  • random65837@lemmy.world
    1047·
    1 year ago

    Most cherry picked biased garbage Ive ever seen. Wonder if any other things could be twisted further out of context from real life.

    And if you FEEL personally attacked by this article

    Words in print can’t “personally attack” people LOL! Unless you’re a bubblewrapped snowflake actively looking to be offended by anything and everything.

    Sticks and stones people…

    • Ekybio@lemmy.worldOP
      257·
      1 year ago

      Thanks for making my point and getting “personally attacked” (triggered) by words.

      • irmoz@reddthat.com
        122·
        1 year ago

        It’s so fucking predictable. Neither of these critical comments even mention anything said in the article. Likely because they aren’t able to refute it, or didn’t even read it in the first place.

          • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
            4·
            1 year ago

            Wait, you are telling me republicans can read? Weren’t they the party standing against intellectuals and scholars because “muh religious truth is better than your scientific one”?

            Oh wait, maybe you meant they can read the single words one by one but they cannot understand the message being conveyed through those words. This would make more sense.

    • irmoz@reddthat.com
      111·
      1 year ago

      How’s it cherry picked? Where’s the greater context that makes these facts more reasonable?

      How’s it biased? What is the true story, and how does the article twist it?

      Also, the last half of your comment is just unhinged rambling about bubblewrapped snowflakes, when everyone knows the real safe space is among conservatives, with fingers in your ears singing “LALALALA”.

      There’s no need to tell this person not everything is offensive. They are not the one being offended. And telling you not to be offended doesn’t mean they themselves are easily offended. That’s an absurd reach. What it means is they have experience bringing truth to conservatives, and know what to expect.

      The final nail in the coffin is that you haven’t made a single argument here that is supported by any facts. You just ignored the actual content and decided to insult OP.