Taking away a lane for cars to create a dedicated bus lane made for faster commutes for everyone, thanks to faster, more reliable service on one of the region’s busiest bus routes.

  • thantik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What made cars so central to being an American?

    FORD, and paying their employees a wage that was enough to be able to afford those cars. Manufacturing in the early 1900s. It’s one of the things that Americans enjoy, along with Baseball, Burgers, Blue Jeans, etc.

    You’ve been too entrenched in that “Americans don’t have culture” lie that you’ve been told. Cars are very much a part of American culture. Racing, customization, engineering, speed, freedom to go wherever you want, whenever you want. Cars are central to individualism and a massive part of our culture.

    Additionally, we’re far less population dense than other nations, with exception of Russia, Canada, and Australia. Individual travel is a necessity for our populace.

    • awesomesauce309@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Culture is as culture does. Cars shouldn’t need to be a necessity for all because some people like them. Does minimum wage afford all Americans a new car today, on top of rent? You’ve been too entrenched in justifying your expensive car loan to yourself.

      • thantik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sorry, I don’t have any car loans. I buy from auctions and repair them for myself. In fact, I probably have worse credit than you do, because I don’t have any. Couldn’t get a loan if I tried. Same with my house, I had to find a by-owner financier.

        I’ve got a '96 Del Sol, An '05 mazda MX-5, A '15 Ford Focus SE, A '12 Hyundai Elantra, an 88 Fiero, and a 99 MR2. Each of them I got for around $2.5k ea due to damage that was wholly repairable, but the insurance companies don’t like the swallow that cost. I probably put another $1.5k into each to get them workable and for the title rework, but obviously my labor to myself is free.

        I bought my 3/2 at the bottom of the 2008 crash, owner-financed for $32k. It’s just a matter of finding the people who can watch for stuff for you. Past the cars and the house, I own basically nothing. No savings right now, but also no rent, and no loans. Insurance on all the cars is basically the same as insurance on 2 of them. It didn’t go up adding the 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc… because I still drive about the same amount, the mileage is just split between them.

        Cars are special to people. They aren’t just a tool to get from point A to point B, but many people’s first real investment into something. They take pride in that. Cars aren’t necessary because people like them, they’ve become a standard expectation because everyone loves them.

        ADDITIONALLY One ocean freighter puts out more emissions than all of the cars in the USA do in a year. Pretending like this is something the people have to sacrifice in order to fix things is blind to the real problems. This is like everyone taking up drinking out of cardboard straws while Nestle still pumps fresh water out of Arizona. It’s pointless, and it puts the burden on the wrong people.

        • awesomesauce309@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Okay then both our assumptions were wrong. Again just because cars are your hobby doesn’t mean we should design our society in a way that both assumes and forces car ownership on people. On top of the economics of every household needing at least access to one car, it is literally making our planet unlivable.

          • thantik@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It really isn’t. Owning and operating cars PALES in comparison to corporate pollution from shipping industries. It’s the rampant consumerism that’s killing the world, not cars. That’s why all the crap about China polluting. China isn’t polluting so much as the US has offshored all of their pollution TO China.

            The argument you’re making is the equiv to all these rich billionaires telling kids to skip the avacado toast and morning coffee.

            Why is it up to the PEOPLE to curb these actions instead of the ones who are actually polluting? Why do the PEOPLE hold responsibility here when it comes to cars? Why do they have to suffer and use public transportation instead of their nice, private, quiet vehicle?

            • awesomesauce309@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              And how many corporations force people to come downtown into offices, and either through fossil fuel emissions or tire particulate, pump carcinogens into high traffic/high population areas? If we want to reduce corporate pollution then we should plan to reduce it across the board, and not allow these real estate companies to dictate WFH.

              The responsibility to transition to a sustainable world isn’t on the people. But it is the people’s responsibility to ensure their government is legislating issues like this properly. Failure to do so is letting down all future generations. This summer shows the results of 50 years of failing to face these issues head on and instead allowing profits to influence legislation. One of those influences is to force cars on people.

              I understand you like your cars but I believe most people only have their cars for these reasons: to get necessities, go to work, and maybe childcare. And many can’t afford the gas to go much further. If more neighborhoods were designed to human scale, so you could walk or ride a bike to access the peoples common needs, that would make living much more affordable and sustainable for many.

    • Sabzero@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well then, I suppose if it is CENTRAL to American identity, perhaps the climate will take that into account and bypass the USA. The solution was looking us right in the face.

      • thantik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Because cars are the problem and not the technology they run on, right? What is this short-sighted shit take?