There was a time where this debate was bigger. It seems the world has shifted towards architectures and tooling that does not allow dynamic linking or makes it harder. This compromise makes it easier for the maintainers of the tools / languages, but does take away choice from the user / developer. But maybe that’s not important? What are your thoughts?

  • LeberechtReinhold@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I kind of agree with your points, but I think there has to be a distinction of libs. Most deps should be static IMHO. But something like OpenSSL I can understand if you go with dynamic linking, especially if it’s a security critical program.

    But for “string parsing library #124” or random “gui lib #35”… Yeah, go with static.

    • heeplr@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      string parsing library #124

      this could also become a major security problem, tho.