Only up-votes on posts and comments are federated. Is there a technical reason why (limitation of ActivityPub?) or is it a social reason?

  • UnshavedYak@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is ActivityPub not open to arbitrary extensions? I thought it was a very loose spec and the only concrete spec is an agreement between instance types. But i’ve not looked at the protocol closely yet, despite developing around it hah.

    • kglitch@kglitch.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes it can be extended but apps would need to be upgraded to make use of the new data flowing around. If they see an activity type they don’t understand they’ll just ignore it.

      Expecting every different platform to all move in lockstep is not feasible so a situation where some support downvotes but some do not is going to have to be part of the process. Even if it was just kbin to kbin initially, that’d still be an improvement.

      • UnshavedYak@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Expecting every different platform to all move in lockstep is not feasible so a situation where some support downvotes but some do not is going to have to be part of the process. Even if it was just kbin to kbin initially, that’d still be an improvement.

        Yea, that is what i was thinking. I myself am working on some ActivityPub stuff and while compat is important to me, i also plan on potentially exposing new features in this manner. If other software wants to federate with it, cool, if not, whatevs. It’s data propagation, as with everything in ActivityPub it’s optional that consumers use it as desired.