In an earlier post, I argued that the historicity of Jesus was doubtful. Some religion scholars questioned one of my sources. Now, recent scholarship comes as close as possible to settling the issue.
  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
    16·
    1 year ago

    Because you’re obviously not interesting in actually learning anything, you just want to argue.

    Attack the argument not the person.

    citing scholarly consensus is not an argument ad populum. So you’re not even correct in asserting a logical fallacy.

    I see. Which logical fallacy did you do, was it argument from authority?

    that link has the sources dipshit.

    Attack the argument not the person.

    Read them if you want. Or stick your fingers in your ears and keep screaming like a child.

    Attack the argument not the person.

    I don’t give a shit about you.

    Clearly, 8 comments in one thread towards me. With 5 personal attacks.

    Now, again. Because a lot of smart people say something does that make it true?