Bitcoin is often pitched as a cheaper alternative to Western Union or Wise for sending money internationally.

“The advantage of using Bitcoin in El Salvador is that it’s much cheaper and faster to send remittances.”
— El Salvador President Nayib Bukele (Reuters, 2021)

Let’s see how true that is — using the most common real-world remittance path:
Sending $100 from the U.S. to Mexico, where the U.S. sends the most remittances.


🔵 Remittance Path (Bitcoin)

  • Buy BTC on Coinbase (U.S.)
  • Send BTC on-chain to Binance (Mexico)
  • Sell BTC for MXN via Binance P2P

📋 Step-by-Step BTC Cost Breakdown

Step Fee (%) Cost ($)
Buy BTC on Coinbase ~0.6% $0.60
BTC withdrawal fee (Coinbase) flat ~$3.00
BTC network fee (on-chain) flat ~$1.50
Sell BTC via Binance P2P (spread) ~2.1% $2.10
Total $7.20
Effective Cost 7.2%

🔗 P2P spread source: p2p.army


🏦 Traditional Comparison: Wise (USD → MXN)

Wise provides full transparency for sending USD to MXN, including:

  • Uses mid-market exchange rate (no FX markup)
  • ~1.3% total fee (includes transfer + conversion)
  • Fee example for $100: $1.27
Step Fee
Transfer fee $1.27
FX rate markup $0.00
Total cost $1.27 (1.3%)

🔗 Wise calculator: wise.com


📊 Final Cost Comparison

Method Total Fee Notes
Wise 1.3% Bank-to-bank, transparent
Bitcoin (on-chain) 7.2% On-chain + exchange spread

🧠 Final Thought

Even when using some of the best-known exchanges on both ends, Bitcoin remittances still cost 5× more than Wise — with more steps, longer wait times, and zero buyer protection.

If Bitcoin is a “better remittance tool,”
why is it more expensive, more complex, and less reliable than existing options?