return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · edit-21 year ago63% of workers unable to pay a $500 emergency expense, survey finds. How employers may help change thatwww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square150fedilinkarrow-up1532arrow-down116cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1516arrow-down1external-link63% of workers unable to pay a $500 emergency expense, survey finds. How employers may help change thatwww.cnbc.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agomessage-square150fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year ago Adjusted for inflation, much lower than today Evidence please. There were loopholes that allowed most people to pay much less, so that’s why they closed those loopholes later Remind me how much rich people pay in taxes now.
minus-squareiopq@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoWe don’t have good WAGE data before 1964 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:United_States_real_wages_(red,_in_constant_2017_dollars).png but we also have household income data for earlier years https://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/famincome.html but it doesn’t match 100% because what a household is differs (households used to be bigger in the 1950s) but you can see that 1950-1964 the household incomes grew quickly, so the 1950s were a period of growth, you were a lot better off by 1970
Evidence please.
Remind me how much rich people pay in taxes now.
We don’t have good WAGE data before 1964
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:United_States_real_wages_(red,_in_constant_2017_dollars).png
but we also have household income data for earlier years
https://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/famincome.html
but it doesn’t match 100% because what a household is differs (households used to be bigger in the 1950s)
but you can see that 1950-1964 the household incomes grew quickly, so the 1950s were a period of growth, you were a lot better off by 1970