Warning: Article has detailed accounts of the shooting

Breanna Gayle Devall Runions, 25, was charged with first-degree murder and aggravated child abuse in the death of Evangaline Gunter.

The child’s parents, Adam and Josie Gunter, told ABC affiliate WATE that Evangaline had been in temporary custody at a home in Rockwood, which Runions shared with girlfriend Christina Daniels and another child, a 7-year-old girl.

Before the shooting, Evangaline and the older girl were being punished that morning by Runions for not waking up the women and for eating Daniels’ food without permission, according to the warrant and a statement from Russell Johnson, district attorney general for Tennessee’s 9th Judicial District. Runions struck both girls with a sandal before forcing them to stand in different corners of the women’s bedroom, authorities said the older girl told them.

After the shooting, the women drove Evangaline to a nearby Walmart location to meet an ambulance, Roane County Medical Examiner Dr. Thomas Boduch told the Roane County News, and the vehicle transported the girl to a hospital where she was pronounced dead. Boduch could not immediately be reached by HuffPost.

  • ProIsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not a firearm issue? Wtf killed her?

    No wonder we’ll never solve this issue. Idiots

    • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is like saying its a car issue because I tried to teach a 4 year old road safety by speeding at them and slamming on the brakes. Its not the car thats the issue.

      • max@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That… is a car issue in the rest of the world, considering some idiot who thinks it’s okay to do that has access to, and probably the privilege of operating such a machine.

          • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, person would be banned from driving.

            But we wouldn’t be banning cars, looking at stricter licenses, or improved regulation. We don’t review after ever drunk driver kills someone because its not the car, or the access to cars that is the problem.

            • max@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, except the US isn’t really doing any of those things. You can still own guns here in the Netherlands, you just have to be a member of a sporting organisation and be licensed and stuff. We don’t have school shootings here.

      • yggdar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Cars are not weapons. They are dangerous, but they haven’t been invented to kill. You also need to do an exam before you’re allowed to drive a car.

        • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Oh, im still surprised you don’t need a course and license like every other country in the world.

          Firearms are tools and serve a purpose, and must be treated the same as every other tool… you know, like years to get a drivers license?

          And fir the record - vehicles have absolutely been used as weapons as everything from vehicular assault to IEDs.

          • sederx@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You missed the point. 2 actually

            1 you need a license and pass an exam to get to drive a car

            2 guns have only one use,kill things. Cars main point is not to kill things.

            • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Didn’t miss first one - literally my first sentence.

              Firearms have multiple purposes - pretty sure the main one right now is to display your own insecurities. Admittedly most of their uses are killing things or the threat of killing things, but sport, target shooting, providing and home defense are all uses. I could argue vehicles are used to show off and as a status symbol more than anything else otherwise we would all be in small efficient cars, people movers and public transport.

      • karmiclychee @sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Given the psychological effect of owning a gun, or having access to one has on a person, I honestly feel like we’re in the same mental health territory as any behavioral antagonist, like leaving an addictive substance around an addict. You take a gun and put everything it means in a person’s hands - the power, the mythology, the kind of baggage it comes with in this country - and it’s gonna have some kind of effect.

        I don’t know about you, but I’ve witnessed, and am aware of many cases where drivers of certain kinds of cars - big, fast, whatever - do stupid, reckless, dangerous, even murderous things because of the feeling of power and control their vehicle gives them. It’s the psychology of the damn things that makes people crazy.

        We have a phrase for it, oddly enough: “it’s like leaving a loaded gun on the table”