• raven [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are you talking about the ex-CEO who got BTFO for being homophobic? Because that was based and cool, actually.

      • raven [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The “precise and specific actions” called for in that article, specifically for the purpose of combating speech that encourages violence, like homophobia or white supremacy:

        • Reveal who is paying for advertisements, how much they are paying and who is being targeted.

        • Commit to meaningful transparency of platform algorithms so we know how and what content is being amplified, to whom, and the associated impact.

        • Turn on by default the tools to amplify factual voices over disinformation.

        • Work with independent researchers to facilitate in-depth studies of the platforms’ impact on people and our societies, and what we can do to improve things.

        What’s your problem here?

        • KickMe@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Turn on by default the tools to amplify factual voices over disinformation.

          This, because it’s a fucking web browser, and it can be weaponized for bad while pretending to be good.

            • KickMe@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Why can’t a browser company just be opinionated about making the best browser? Why does it have to have a shitty controversial opinion about social media? I don’t know why, but my trust in the org and therefore the browser itself is gone.

              • raven [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I don’t think being anti white supremacy and homophobia is shitty or controversial. Why would an Internet company write an article about something that affects the biggest sector of the Internet, social media? 🤔
                “No they should stay in their lane and only talk about, I don’t know, CSS or something.” I don’t buy it.

                • KickMe@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Who said anything about white supremacy or homophobia?

                  Regardless, yes, they should refrain from controversial subjects that are not related to their business. And if they decide to make social media censorship their business in a direct way, also fuck em.

                  • raven [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    …the article you linked me? The topic of this discussion?

                    It shouldn’t be controversial to anyone. The suggestions given there are pretty mild. Regardless, justice is not the absence of conflict. Sorry the article made you upset but that doesn’t make it wrong.