Image Transcription:

An 8-panel Phoebe Teaching Joey meme.

The first panel is Phoebe from Friends saying “Russia”.

The second panel is Joey from the same show replying with “Russia”.

The third panel is Phoebe saying “has invaded”.

The fourth panel is Joey repeating back “has invaded”.

The fifth panel is Phoebe saying “Ukraine”.

The sixth panel is Joey repeating back “Ukraine”.

The seventh panel is Phoebe saying the completed phrase “Russia has invaded Ukraine”.

The final panel shows Joey proudly proclaiming “NATO just started a proxy war”.

  • OwenEverbindeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You can ignore everything I’m about to write. I’m just thinking through this in written form.

    Here goes: it’s a bit confusing for me. Tankies call themselves leftists. In fact, they call us “pro-capitalists” because we don’t believe in authoritarianism.

    And it feels weird to me to be in one of two groups both saying, “you’re not REAL anti-capitalists” at each other.

    So here goes:

    • the Nazis weren’t nationalist socialists
    • the USSR wasn’t a republic controlled by worker Soviets
      • In fact, the use of tanks on Hungarian worker Soviets was what gave tankies their name. They were actually anti Soviet.
    • the Democratic Republic of North Korea isn’t democratic
    • the People’s Republic of China does not belong to its people
    • Moms for Liberty doesn’t want liberty (and is filled with numerous people who aren’t even moms)
    • a majority membership of the National Black Republican Organization is white

    So yes, I must acknowledge that a group of pro-authoritarians can call themselves leftists without being leftists.

    … it still feels weird though. Because if you view it from their perspective, they are leftists. And we are capitalists’ enablers.

    Wait! I think I see it. Their embrace of violent regimes and violent tactics destroys working class unity and alienates non-violent, compassionate anti-capitalists. They actively choose Stalin over Trotsky and Trotsky over Kerensky, and (like they did with Marguerit Duras) drive anyone out of the movement who won’t support that choice.

    They are anti-solidarity. And you cannot be a leftist and be anti-solidarity.

    • Discoslugs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They are anti-solidarity. And you cannot be a leftist and be anti-solidarity.

      Im a radical leftist. Specifically an anarchist.

      I was arguing with tankies the other day, because I defined Tankie as an authoritarian Communists. In an effort to differentiate between communists I would work with as an anarchist.

      Many people (mostly hailing from hexbear )really didn’t like it. Cue endless whataboutism and people calling me a lib. Btw according to some hexbear folx. Its not imperialism when the USSR invaded Afghanistan, but it is when the US did it later. Lol.

      I too want to exclude tankies from leftism. For many reasons. But the truth is that communism even authoritarian communism is leftist.

      We dont need to “no true scotmen” leftism. There are problematic elements that we need to recognize and deal with in a way that is not simply saying “we are not them.” Its much healthier and factually correct simply to say that state communism Trends towards a police state aka towards authoritarianism. And I dont support that.

      Just my 2 cents.

      • OwenEverbindeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We dont need to “no true scotmen” leftism.

        Fair enough.

        Btw according to some hexbear folx. Its not imperialism when the USSR invaded Afghanistan, but it is when the US did it later.

        🤣

      • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like I said, I don’t think the political spectrum is just 1 line. I think there’s an X and a Y axis at the very least

    • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I think tankies and anarcho socialist types want wildly different things only that there’s a not insignificant amount of overlap in how they’re both looking to achieve it.

      For the record, I think capitalism is a failed system (well, for anyone other than the billionaire class) but while I and a tankie might agree on certain things it is for different reasons. Cue the Gustavo Fring meme

    • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Capitalism is, at it’s core, any system where d(Power) / dt = k (Power) - a + b (random(t)) where power is your ability to impact or influence the world or not be influenced by it unduely.

      Any one who has a/k or less power has it systematically taken from them and assigned to those with the most.

      Power can be money or political favour with the party. Window dressing and semantic games don’t reallly matter. Fascism is the exercise of trying to set b to 0.

      Tankies are capitalists.

      The left is the exercise of trying to make k negative.

      • Staccato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Buddy I enjoyed differential equations as much as the next guy, but differential formulae are not a great way to communicate any concepts in a text forum, not even concepts that are modeled by differential equations.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tankies are capitalists

        Fucking lol man I love this site sometimes.

        The only good thing about leftists is that they’re this ridiculous about everything.

        • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          In what way are the states they worship remotely socialist, communist, or anarchist? The means of production are controlled by a small elite who increase their share of control over the means of prodiction by leveraging this control. The only thing that distinguishes the economic stratification of the CCP or the late soviet union from capitalist states is semantic word games.

          It’s the same thing as a market based oligopoly.

          There have been left wing states, and left wing projects within right wing states, but worshipping putin or winnie the pooh ain’t it.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m here to laugh at ridiculous leftists dunking on ridiculous leftists, not to debate the finer points of tankie theory.

            I don’t take anyone who self-identifies as a leftist seriously.

            • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You know, i think that’s your only flaw. You’re an intelligent, reasoned individual with a blind spot, in this self identifying dumbasses opinion. I wonder how your came to dismiss that school of thought specifically? Surely there are as many neoliberal frothers as tankies? Would you mind explaining why?

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You might consider me a neoliberal “frother”, though I don’t understand the term.

                I believe in evidence-based best practice, in both policy and in life.

                If you’d like to get into the weeds on this, I’d be happy to, as you seem quite pleasant. Note that I specifically used the term “ridiculous leftists” because I do in fact have friends I think are just wrong, but not ridiculous.

                • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You might consider me a neoliberal “frother”

                  I don’t. I (full disclosure) looked through your history in order to find some hypocrisy or froth and failed. Frankly, your comments are good, to my initial chagrin.

                  For ‘frothers’ There are a few frother types but i think the kind that disturbs me the most are the ones ive seen who conflate critisism of the us dem party as republican operatives at best and traitorous at worst. Usually the frother’s “arguments” boil down to adhominem and derision rather than reason, which looks to me as ridiculous as the orange mafia frothers.

                  As someone who used to donate monthly to the DNC and who is coming to terms with the corruption and ratfucking i simply can’t abide, it’s difficult to hold a conversation with like minded leftists who are searching for a new answer, a new way of describing what is happening to us, because at least for me, the answers i have heard in my 45 years in this earth just don’t make sense anymore.

                  So that’s me, and I’m serious when i ask you why you’ve come to feel that no leftie should be taken seriously.

                  As difficult as it is to convey through the Internet, i really am just curious to hear your thought process because you write well, that i might consider your position and maybe if im lucky, add nuance to mine.

                  Maybe we both will? Or maybe you’ll think im the one with toothpaste face

                  • SCB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    First let’s define some terms: I define “leftist” as “communist.” That’s how they define themselves as well. “Tankies” are a separate breed, in that they specifically idealize the Soviet Union and other authoritarian “communist” states. I am personally of the opinion that the term “socialist” is meaningless in online discourse, as few people mean it the way it was originally used - workers owning companies (which I strongly disagree with, for clarity - though I support things like mandatory profit-sharing)

                    Not everyone who is left of me is a Communist, though I obviously have disagreements with all of them - but then, I joke with people IRL that “regardless of your political views, if we talk long enough we’ll find something I believe that will piss you off so we probably just shouldn’t get into it.”

                    As for me, my journey was largely begun through being raised in a staunchly pro-union household and working on various political campaigns (my aunt is a politician). I am very pro-union, very pro-labor, very pro-individual/pro-freedom (we’ll circle back on this because this is also a Republican claim) and also very pro-market.

                    I’m willing to bet (though correct me if I am wrong), that it is my pro-market stance you most likely disagree with (of what is listed). I am pro-market because markets are demonstrably the most efficient way to allocate goods. I support evidence-based policy that has real impacts.

                    For instance, I am against rent control, because I 100% believe that rent controls, passed in an environment of massive supply shortages of housing, exacerbate the problem by limiting incentives for new housing construction. Data supports this. I also believe that any new housing at any price point increases aggregate supply and lowers pricing (though there are “tipping points” in supply that just be reached). The right way out of the housing crisis is therefore, in my view, to end single-family zoning and disincentivize single-family home ownership through higher taxes.

                    However, markets have limits to their efficacy, because people like to bend rules in their favor as just a matter of course. The government exists to address these externalities. This is why I support a public health option or even single-payer - I’ve done the math and such options save both employers and employees money. I also support dramatically increasing the number of residencies allowed, contrary to the AMA, because artificially limiting residencies restricts the supply of doctors. This organization knows this and purposely limits our supply of doctors so they make more money. Our health care system is riddled with such externalities, which single-payer or public options do a lot to address.

                    Rather than refine the system to address externalities, leftists (as I’ve defined them) want to burn the system to the ground and start afresh. I believe this will not only result in poorer outcomes, it will also result in a catastrophic and obscene loss of life. It will also implement a system that denies personal autonomy and freedom, as I see it (told you we’d circle back!)

                    I am a bit of an absolutist radical when it comes to freedom. I believe government can only ethically exist at the consent of the governed - so tankies are right out. I believe in free movement of people, trade as free as is geopolitically feasible, and that capital investment allows potential business owners to make dreams come true that otherwise would not. I accept limits of freedom, because we do live in a society, but I believe we often aim toward the society over the individual’s actual best interest. I am deeply morally opposed to vengeance-based systems of justice and am generally a prison abolitionist. For this reason, I have the deeply unpopular belief that the 13th amendment’s exception for slavery is a good thing and (paid at minimum wage) compulsory labor is better than prison for most criminals.

                    This got a bit longer than I intended, but it helps form the mindset from which my views come. Happy to answer any questions or hear your takes.

                    Edit: I am interested in your thoughts process as well.