My mother, born, raised, and still lives in Norway, was anti-mask during COVID and refused to take the vaccine because of micro-robots (and the scary 5G towers), so we all know where she stands in certain topics. She also believes that Zelenskyy is the reason for Russia invading Ukraine…

Anyhoo, I was talking to her then other day, and she told me that I need to stop reading anti-propaganda. I laughed and asked if she could explain it, which she, of course, could not, but she said it’s a wording being used online all the time. I don’t frequent the sites she does, and I’ve known she’s been reading conspiracies for at least 10 years, but anti-propaganda? Does words not have meaning anymore?

If you ask me, anti-propaganda is facts, but hey, I might be wrong, considering English is my second language.

  • Pamasich@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you ask me, anti-propaganda is facts

    You know how “woke” (awake; aware of what’s going on) is considered a negative by the far right?

    Their entire point is to abandon the facts of reality and instead live in a dream world where only their imagination is real. Facts and people who cling to the real world are their enemy to that end.

  • CoffeeBreakfast@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t believe most people that go down this road are going to listen to any logic. Trying to combat it by telling them they are wrong and why just makes them dig their heels in even more.

    You can ask empathetic questions and try to learn what brought her here. A lot of people start a normal amount of right wing, and then the internet feeds them more and more far right stuff and this happens. There’s a sense of community and belonging to these spaces.

    If you care about her and want to continue the relationship, ask that neither of you bring up politics and just talk about your lives, see if she has anything good going on, and encourage local activities if possible.

    Channel 5 did a movie called Dear Kelly about a guy who went full conspiracy after losing his house and I believe custody of his kids. In the movie they talk about past trauma leading to this obsession.

    Try to be compassionate if you can. It can be very difficult depending on the person and the existing relationship but I think it’s the only real way forward. Alternatively I also think if they are abusive or too over the top just cutting ties with them works too.

    It can be very frustrating, but I hope it works out. Good luck!

  • Robin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    4 days ago

    If she has accepted that she is pro-propaganda then maybe you need to link her to the Wikipedia page for the word.

    “Propaganda is communication that is primarily used to influence or persuade an audience to further an agenda, which may not be objective and may be selectively presenting facts to encourage a particular synthesis or perception, or using loaded language to produce an emotional rather than a rational response to the information that is being presented”

    • Grimtuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      4 days ago

      I like the Oxford dictionary definition:

      “The systematic dissemination of information, esp. in a biased or misleading way, in order to promote a particular cause or point of view, often a political agenda.”

      • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        So, it doesn’t matter what the bias is. It’s still propaganda. The opposite of that would be a balanced view without any bias. So, would that also imply restricting to just factual information?

        • untorquer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Beyond a diverse sourcing of information one could consider sources which present their bias up front.

          An analysis seated in a well communicated philosophy is better than one with its motive hidden behind a mask.

          Furthermore, information being factual isn’t enough to be unbiased. Bias also applies to the selection of information being presented, or more importantly, not presented.

          • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            That’s a good point. The information would have to be factual and compressive, which is a tall order. You could still miss some details unintentionally, with would mess things up.

            Stating your biases up front is a reasonable compromise, so let’s go with that. If you’re reading a Nazi blog, you know what their biases are, so you can take that information with the appropriate grain of salt. If you’re listening to a space lizard podcast, a few hefty spoons should do it.

    • gwilikers@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’d like to add that Wikipedia itself, while an amazing resource, can be full of propaganda. I came across a page for an international organisation against chemical warfare and went to the edit history. Sourced additions regarding complaints by scientists on the ground in Syria that their findings were being completely misrepresented to show Assad was using chemical warfare were consistently scrubbed without any reason given.

      It’s funny that I was actually looking at that page randomly while considering how to code a tool that would highlight the most recent (and therefore unreviewed) edits on wiki. I got the idea from a Defcon talk on how to counter and deal with misinformation. It’s ironic that in this instance, it was the more established editors that were propagating misnformation.

  • NABDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I managed to logic my parents out of one thing.

    My parents actually asked me if it was possible that the vaccines contained 5G micro robots.

    After taking a moment to maintain my composure and put on my “pretend I wasn’t asked a stupid question and answer seriously” face, I asked them to take out their phone.

    When the phone was in their hand, I asked them to consider the fact that it must be charged every day to keep working, and that the vast majority of the size of the phone was taken up by the battery. Then I pointed out that a device small enough to be injected wouldn’t have enough power to still be on when it left the needle.

    Luckily I didn’t have to go further than that.

    I think that’s the only time I’ve had any success pounding logic into them. I think the problem is they can’t think of me as anything but a child, except where computers are concerned.

    They paid for my computer science degree, and they know I’ve been working in IT for 32 years, and I answer all their computer questions. So, if the subject is computer-related, I’m their expert. Anything else and I’m just a deluded child.

    I haven’t tried talking to my mom about the SSA COBOL AI rewrite yet. I’m not sure if she heard about it or if she did whether she understood enough to even be concerned enough to ask me.

  • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I started using anti-vaxx propaganda tactics satirically.

    The goal is to show how the tactic is manipulative by applying it to something obviously not dangerous.

    Water is easy, start insisting that “dihydrogen monoxide” is dangerous:

    Celebrity just died? “They had dihydrogen monoxide before they died, maybe it killed them”

    “All traffic fatalities in the last 5 years were link to people using dihydrogen monoxide”

    “Dihydrogen overdoses kill people every year”

    “Why is dihydrogen monoxide in everything? Why is big dihydrogen monoxide putting this in everything, what are they trying to do?”

    “I bet Trump was on dihydrogen monoxide when he thought of his tariffs plan”

    Etc

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Did you know there are more hydrogen atoms in a single water molecule than stars in our whole solar system?

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        there are more hydrogen atoms in a single water molecule

        Hydrogen atoms?! Didn’t they use that in the hydrogen bomb? And in the Hindenburg Disaster? OH THE HUMANITY!

  • normalexit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    4 days ago

    This reminds me of the people that say they are anti-antifa.

    "Anti-propaganda aims to undermine the effectiveness of propaganda by exposing its manipulative tactics, providing alternative perspectives, or offering factual information to counter biased claims.

    I’d pick my battles and try to address the most harmful lines of thought first. Like anything medical for example. Deprogramming is a popular topic online so there are some resources out there.

    Best of luck, it’ll be difficult until you find a foothold.

    • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is not true and I wish it wouldn’t be repeated ad infinitum.

      I used to be a pretty hardcore christian and used logic to completely get rid of religion in my life.

      • SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think there’s a disconnect here.

        I also used to be a hardcore Christian and did the same thing. But the fact is, my own lived experience brought me out of it. No one could have sinply talked me out of my beliefs. It was literally all I knew. These were conclusions I had to come to on my own, because I was questioning them to begin with.

        If I was not questioning the validity of it to start, I would not have looked for new amounts of information.

        If people are not curious or open enough, they will stay in what they perceive to be their “truth”, with no amount of logic being able to sway them.

        Basically, if they’re not searching for truth, presenting them with truth will not sway them.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        It is not logical to take Christianity as a representation of all other religions.

        For a debate about similarities and differences between the Abrahamic religions i can recommend to have a look at this informative and entertaining Panel.

        Jews and Muslims also think many Christian concepts to be illogical, especially the concept of Trinity or Jesus as son of God, which we see in contradiction to the oneness of God.

        • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          The claim was that you can’t logic someone out of something that they didn’t logic themselve into.

          I did not logic myself into having faith that christianity is true but I did logic myself out of it.

          • uienia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            The thing is that there have to be an incentive to receive and accept that logic. Something beyond logic.

            You can’t use logic against someone who is completely emotionally invested in a cause. They need to somehow be open to contradiction, which most cultists certainly aren’t.

            So in that respect it could be said that you didn’t logic yourself out of it, because you had already accepted contradiction to your beliefs before you started using logic.

  • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I feel like the word propaganda gets a little misused. There’s so much negativity attached to it, but propaganda at it’s core is media that tries to persuade someone. So media trying to undo misinformation about COVID is also propaganda.

  • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Cut the source of the actual propaganda being pumped into her head.

    Curiously, when these people are cut of from the source of hate and fear being pumped into their heads for a month or so, they start to be more rational.

    • P1nkman@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s doing to be hard. She’s reading all the right-wing websites in Norway and Europe. I wish I could, and my brother and myself have told her multiple times in the past 5 years how wrong she is (“Norwegian government is hacking my Facebook because I’m critical to them” when Facebook photos were down for all of Europe for a few hours), but she does but listen. Might be because she looks at her children as children, and not actual grown men with degrees. She also lives in Spain now, so hard to do anything with her WiFi.

      • Geetnerd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, I understand it’s easier said than done. I’m dealing with this with my older sister.

    • Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Propaganda isn’t necessarily lies. It is just biased towards the author’s agenda with the goal to persuade a target demographic. For example: an article (or pamphlets being air dropped over their lines) blasting Russia for summarily executing their own troops for retreating would both be factual and propaganda.

      That said, I agree with your sentiment. Facts counter the ‘undesirable propaganda’.

  • Ideonek@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    In comics Anti-hero, is not a villain. It’s a hero, using same tools as villains would (Deadpool, Punisher, etc).

    Anti-pripaganda. Is a propaganda with opposite vector. Same tools, different goal.

    If propaganda is “USA is roten country with systemic oppression off all but 1%, that is comming for our freedom and our resources”, the anti-propaganda would be “USA is the greatest country in the word and things we do are good becouse we are ones doing it. What even is a Patriot Act? Only terrorist should worry about stuff like this.”

  • iii@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Perhaps she’s worried you might prefer her sister over her, because of you falling for aunti-propaganda?