• vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Lol that’s not the far left’s position get the fuck out of here. The first paragraph is describing center/center-left.

      • hansolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because hyperbole sells.

        I consider myself a Centrist simply because both sides can fuck right off. The Left can’t barely manage to do 3 things right before fumbling everything. The Right traded the former guise of fiscal responsibility for LARPing as Nazis. “Sides” are a false choice forced on voters to give two brands of dickbag a duopoly to their benefit.

      • vga@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It sure is progressive though. That’s such a weird word to use as a pejorative. I mean I can get the theory behind being against a big nanny state, but why call it an unambigously positive term then?

    • Czechmate23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sadly in America meeting everyones basic needs is socialist and too close to Communism for our poor brain washed masses. Sadly the country culture is summarized in “fuck you i got mine” mentality and not community based.

      • vga@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Seize the means of production.

        Fuck tradition.

        Fuck economics.

        Kill the people who resist or disagree, or sometimes also if you just feel like killing them. For the rest, strip away basic rights so that they won’t rise up to dismantle the system.

        As someone pointed out, perhaps things are a bit different in America, but this is how I see far left generally from Europe.

          • ZhprbE@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            State-run communism as it has actually existed and fascism end up with very similar results, not the least because both believed in fast progress, dismantling traditional communities and value systems and everything being run by a strong man with an iron fist. The fascist dictator is supposedly a personification of the will of the “people” or “nation”, while the communist one is the same for the “proletariat” or, indeed, the “people”. The fact that both systems produce cleptocratic oligarchies that destroy lives of ordinary people is no accident.

            This is also why the “extreme left” supposed by the OP is not extreme at all. Some just tend to confuse evend mild and moderate social democracy with genocidal communism, perhaps because their domestic political landscape is fucked up beyond recognition

            • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              It doesn’t help that the communists here usually deny the communist autocracies of the past as “not real communism, this time it’ll work bro trust me,” and when you press them on their beliefs you learn they find killing political dissidents not only acceptable, but they’re excited to line you up against the wall “the second they get a chance.”

              And the milder, actually center leftists like you describe, deny the existence of Group A above outright instead of saying “yeah those guys are crazy, we’re not like them,” but then turn around and count the supposed nonexistent Group A as their compatriots against “the nazis.” (But when Group A’s genocide takes off guess who will quickly fail a purity test and be shot just after all the nazis and anarchists, yup, it’s Group B here.)

              America’s left needs to realize that people like those represented by lemmy’s own tankie triad are real, are “left” not just “right playing dress up,” and are dangerous people to them as well and to normal people, not “just the nazis.” It reminds me of Trump not denouncing the KKK because they supported him, but you can disavow people who unironically support the Holodomor and want to do it again to their kulaks while also pushing for social policies that benefit the people.

                • vga@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  Well I’d claim that nazis were a problem during 1945-(whenever they came back as a credible threat), even if they weren’t a credible threat for many decades. Same applies to tankies or really every other kind of … let’s say hidden infestation. It’s like mold in a house.

                  But it’s of course important to focus on the worst problem at the time. You don’t care about mold if your house is on fire.

          • vga@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            The 4th point yes indeed. Hence the horseshoe theory. Fascists love tradition though and have not usually gone to seizing the means of production in a general way at least.

            • ZhprbE@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              The original fascists of Italy went actually extra hard for Futurists (the avant garde movement in art and philosophy, whose main premise was “out with the old, in with the new guns and machines go brrrrrr”), who in turn celebrated Mussolini as a great leader. Nazis were good at incorporating traditionalist aesthetics to make their flair of violent modernism more palatable - it probably helped that industrialisation had developed much further in Germany than in Italy, having already done most of the work of dismantling traditional rural society and the structures it came with. And yeah, they didn’t seize the means of production directly, but it’s also not like German industrialists (who had significantly helped Hitler to power) really had much options in deciding what to produce and to whom, or what kind of opinions to publicly hold, once the Nazis really got their show going.

              Really makes you think about the short-sightedness of the current American business elite propping up their own Fascists. I guess we’ll see who will be faster to eat who this time around

            • kreskin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              horseshoe theory is a centrist nonsense contrivance. It suggests that the left and right both end up taking the public to the same outcomes.