- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
One of the main arguments brought forth for the switching to the WebExtensions system for browser extensions was that it made cross-browser extensions easier. Firefox users may now reap the benefits of this promise, as Mozilla has implemented functionality in the browser to import extensions from other browsers.
The feature, which is in testing at the moment, can be enabled by all users of the latest stable version of Firefox.
The feature is limited at the time to Google Chrome and select extensions. Even though Firefox and Chrome extensions use the same framework, WebExtensions, they are not compatible immediately. Firefox users who attempt to install extensions from Chrome’s Web Store may notice that this is not working.
Anyone taking advantage of this? What Chrome exclusives are actually worth checking out?
Seems like it’s just for making the switch from Chrome smoother, rather than being useful for long-time Firefox users.
So… If the extension is exclusive to chrome, nothing gets installed in Firefox, right?
Seems like it. The article also mentioned that there are only 73 pairs available, so it sounds like Mozilla has to explicitly define what Chrome extensions corresponds to what Firefox extension.
I was moderately intrigued by this story until I got to that part. The headline is correct but kind of misleading. I’m sure many people will read it and think Firefox can now run Chrome extensions directly.
Booooo
Deluminate.
As an aspiring singer, Transposer is a godsend to me.
For me it would be the Revolut extension.
as a roblox player ropro is a extension that used to be avaible in firefox great extension it brings features like hours played on a game server hopping server selection and more trading stuff if your trading on roblox