An autocratic country could easily spread propaganda in the democratic country, because of “free speech” rules that most democratic countries have, but a democratic country cannot easily spread its propaganda in the autocratic country.

An autocratic country can buy an election in the democratic country, but the democratic country cannot easily coup an autocratic country.

Are all democracies are doomed to fail?

Is the future of humanity, autocracy? For the rest of humanity’s existence?

      • naught101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Between what? Democracy and oligarchy? Yeah, I guess. Most of those terms are often used pretty loosely…

    • Amnesigenic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The US has never been a democracy, we’ve never been a particularly equitable representative republic either and our government was designed this way on purpose

      • naught101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Guess it depends on how you define the term. The US certainly fits the minimalist representative definition. I don’t think equity is inherently part of the definition… Obviously I think it should be, but that’s more of a value overlaid on the organisational system, I think…

        • Amnesigenic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Literally all communication depends on how you define the terms you use, that’s the whole point of having fixed definitions for words, and the US absolutely does not fit any reasonable definition of a democracy

          • naught101@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 minutes ago
            1. Fixed definitions for words do not exist. Language is constantly evolving.
            2. The US IS a representative democracy, and whether that’s actually functionally providing government by the people doesn’t really prevent this use of the term by a vast majority of people, whether you or I agree with it or not.
            3. In the context of the question, I think the US seems to fit more into the OP’s democracy category. I agree I’m using the term loosely, but does your terminology disagreement actually add anything?