Source Link Privacy.

Privacy test result

https://themarkup.org/blacklight?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tarlogic.com%2Fnews%2Fbackdoor-esp32-chip-infect-ot-devices%2F&device=mobile&location=us-ca&force=false

Tarlogic Security has detected a backdoor in the ESP32, a microcontroller that enables WiFi and Bluetooth connection and is present in millions of mass-market IoT devices. Exploitation of this backdoor would allow hostile actors to conduct impersonation attacks and permanently infect sensitive devices such as mobile phones, computers, smart locks or medical equipment by bypassing code audit controls.

Update: The ESP32 “backdoor” that wasn’t.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not the first time a backdoor was found on Chinese made hardware and it won‘t be the last time. Decoupling can‘t happen quickly enough.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Which government’s backdoors would you prefer?

      “We know you have a choice in oppressive governments, so we appreciate you choosing ours.”

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        None of them, that’s why the only things in my house that connect to the internet are my computers, game consoles, and cell phone

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            Like I said 6 hours ago, just because I can’t mitigate all of the risk doesn’t mean that I shouldn’t mitigate as much as I reasonably can.

            My 3d printer is a fire hazard, but that’s no excuse for leaving a bunch of candles unattended.

            • targetx@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Ah I missed the other comment, my client still had a cached view apparently. And definitely true regarding mitigation, your phrasing just read funny to me :)

        • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Assuming you’re not joking here, if your computers are any way modern they almost certainly have a backdoor.

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            22 hours ago

            Obviously, but I trust my Linux mint laptop a hell of a lot better than my aunt’s XIPPLG branded wifi cat feeder that she bought off Amazon

              • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                33 minutes ago

                From what I understand, the only way to mitigate the risks relating to IME or AMD PSP is to simply not have a computer in the first place. Like I’ve said elsewhere twice now, it’s worth mitigating some risks even if we can’t mitigate all of them. I don’t want the most advanced computing device in my home to be an astrolabe.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I guarantee all off those have components from manufacturers that a government could pressure for a backdoor.

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            20 hours ago

            You are correct, and it doesn’t change my stance at all. It’s still worth it to mitigate risk even if you can’t mitigate all risk.

            Like, the fact that my 3d printer is already a fire hazard does not justify leaving a bunch of candles unattended

    • randompasta@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      True, but the ESP32 is used by a lot of devices. This backdoor is pretty huge in scope of devices impacted.

      • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        It depends on what the method of attack is. I’m not seeing anything saying that it would be possible to exploit wirelessly, so this could easily be mostly a non-issue.

    • Bear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I mean, most users here are browsing using a device with an AMD or Intel CPU, both with known backdoors. Not the first time a backdoor was found on American made hardware and it won’t be the last.