• rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    The exact wording seems to be “banned content”, which includes a lot more than just violence (is violence banned in the first place, considering subs like r/PublicFreakout?).

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah tbh if it were just violent content I’d be fine with that. I still don’t trust Reddit as a platform anymore, but I’d be 100% understanding of the rule.

      Banned/Removed-by-Admin content, though? That’s absurd. That’s way too broad.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I think it’s advocating violence, and extreme violence (things like terrorist beheading videos and such) that are banned. Things like Waffle House fights likely won’t meet the banning threshold.

      • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.ukM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I assume this is prompted by Luigi-inspired death threats to CEOs. If they are monitoring this so closely, I bet the FBI might want to take a look at those records too…

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I think it very well could, as well as any other reddit corporate agenda such as removing content at request of pieces of shit who punch and berate service staff and then later sue to remove said content from the internet. It’s a necessary distinction.