return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 day agoShots fired into insurance CEO’s Oregon homewww.oregonlive.comexternal-linkmessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up1561arrow-down14cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1557arrow-down1external-linkShots fired into insurance CEO’s Oregon homewww.oregonlive.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square69fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·17 hours agoThey certainly do need to foot the bill for unsafe workplaces, but that does not need to be tied directly to injuries. They should be paying for the unsafe workplace even if no one is injured, and even more if someone is injured.
minus-squarespooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-217 hours ago They should be paying for the unsafe workplace even if no one is injured, and even more if someone is injured. You just described the purpose of both OSHA and workman’s comp.
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-216 hours agoYes, I know. I am saying they should be one thing instead of two things.
They certainly do need to foot the bill for unsafe workplaces, but that does not need to be tied directly to injuries. They should be paying for the unsafe workplace even if no one is injured, and even more if someone is injured.
You just described the purpose of both OSHA and workman’s comp.
Yes, I know. I am saying they should be one thing instead of two things.