Just wanted to prove that political diversity ain’t dead. Remember, don’t downvote for disagreements.

  • ziproot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I believe that the stance against nuclear power (specifically, nuclear fission, as opposed to radioisotope power used by spacecraft) by greens undermines the fight to stop global warming, and that many of the purported issues with nuclear power have been solved or were never really issues in the first place.

    For instance: the nuclear waste produced by old-gen reactors can be used by newer generations.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I fully agree that nuclear SHOULD have been part of the solution. I disagree that it should now be part of it. We have lost too much knowledge regarding nuclear power to lack of investment. We no longer have time to rebuild that to get it online. Hopefully it can become part of the solution eventually, but 10-20 years is now far too long to wait.

    • gerryflap@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah same. It makes the elections quite annoying because I agree with the local green party in almost every other way. But to me nuclear power is an important way to get reliable green energy. Something that still provides energy when the wind is not blowing and the sun isn’t shining. And to me some of the arguments feel way too “feeling based” instead of facts based. That its unsafe or dirty.

      Preferably we’d have fusion, but until we manage to get that going I think nuclear fission is a decent alternative. Not forever, but for the coming 50-100 years until we find a better alternative.