• MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      That doesn’t exist. Though, luckily, in countries like Australia, it’s universal enough to put outspoken Nazis in prison.

      I’ll take that over whatever the fuck is going on the the US.

      Even if free speech is diminished a tiny bit. We all (most of us) love Nazis being in prison 👍👍

      • novacomets
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Again, what is the definition of Nazi that is universally recognized?

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          We don’t operate under a framework where everything needs to be 100% defined, else prosecuting/legislating would become unreasonably cumbersome to the point where it’d be so easy to find loopholes.

          Whatever a jury of your peers determines is reasonable to define as hate speech, under guidance of the law. Here’s an example: https://www.ag.gov.au/national-security/publications/displaying-prohibited-symbols-offences

          You’re trying so hard to justify that all speech should be tolerated, but it should not.

          Look what they’re getting the the US, barely hidden Nazis in positions of power.

          Fuck that.

          • novacomets
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            What do you purpose doing about the Ukrainian Nazis in power?

            • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              There it is folks, we found a troll.

              Honestly, I’m not terribly well-versed on the Ukraine situation, but you are not arguing in good faith, and just side-stepping it.