• jol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    At this point if you still belive the Internet can survive without ads, you’re just being naïve.

    • unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Survive

      Meaning what?

      I look at the Open-Source/Foss ecosystem and see amazing projects being built, tested, and utilized. All the while lacking the advertisements that some people seem to think are pivotal.

      • Kevin@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        That may also potentially be survivorship bias. IMO the only open source projects that would live to tell the tale are:

        • Foundational projects that are critical components in major tech stacks, having a backing in the form of funded developers or donations from companies involved in those tech stacks
        • Enterprise-scale projects born out of a consortium of companies
        • Hobby projects that the creators aren’t relying on as their sole source of income

        At least two of those categories are reliant on funding from companies, which in turn relies on either their well-entrenched presence in their respective market, or their ability to market themselves effectively (ex, via advertising).