A stark example of how digital footprints will be utilized in a post-Roe America

The article is from Aug 10, 2022 but remains relevant

  • Kichae@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It would also be literally illegal for Facebook to have not done this.

    And? It’s not like they’ve ever given a shit about the law when they want to do something that benefits them.

    Unjust laws aren’t worth following, and Facebook has the power to fight them. They choose not to.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d genuinely be curious what you’d do if police showed up to your door with a warrant ready to take you to jail if you didn’t comply.

      Maybe you’d actually refuse, I don’t know. But I think there are a whole lot more people who want to think that they would refuse and suffer very real consequences of it than would actually do it.

      • xuxebiko@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks to Citizens United, corporations are people. But people are not corporations.

        They do not have an army of corporate attorneys, nor do they employ lobbying firms to buy political support, nor do they have enormous wealth to fall back on. People simply do not enjoy the protections corporations do. Yet its regular people who frequently take a stand against wrong, and not multi-billion corporations.

        Facebook/Meta, a corporate with tremendous resources, made promises about defending access to reproductive healthcare in a post-Roe world and it should be questioned for failing to keep their word. Getting personal (like you just did with @Kichae) just shifts responsibility away from facebook/meta for its actions.

        • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Regardless, there are very much actual people within Meta that can and would be held legally liable for refusing to comply with a valid warrant, up to and including going to jail.

          I agree that there are plenty to things to criticize Meta for. They could do a lot more to educate users about what privacy they do or don’t have and the legal consequences of that. They could direct more people to Messenger’s private mode, which is end-to-end encrypted. I don’t think the act of complying with a warrant is something that I would really hold against them though, because 99% of people would do the same thing.