I get the stupid basic excuse about big tech purchasing loads of silicon. That reasoning seems deeply flawed and idiotic to me. If Deepseek R1 democratizes training more for less, then that means customers with mid to small size data centers like universities now have access to train and research models in this space. Nvidia does not have a real competitor, so they get the sale. Their potential customer base just grew exponentially right? OpenAI should be devalued massively by this change, but I don’t see why anything impacts Nvidia negatively in this instance. Am I missing something or is the market this level of stupid? (I have no skin in this game)

  • gigachad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The stock market is crazy and it doesn’t always act rational. Now that I said this, I think the reason is more a question of Chinese vs US technical superiority. In theory, China has no access to the high technology AI chips from NVIDIA, due to sanctions. This must mean that Deepseek was developed with cheaper chips, and NVIDIA chips are not necessary for training LLMs.

    • j4k3@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That is what my intuition was looking for but not finding. I wasn’t thinking about the ban and implications. This makes much more sense.