Suppose you have a fediverse admin, perhaps one of the several who are oppressive, and they are roaming around somewhere like Twitter or Reddit. One day they spot someone on there they don’t like, maybe someone they know from the fediverse or maybe not, and they give the person a hard time. Are we allowed to talk about those activities, especially considering the barrier is already crossed the other way?
Because you can’t speak for another’s intentions. And this (along with me being banned from there; that’s only one half of their domain) is reiterated as many times as it has been for the very reason that it has to be. It’s not anyone acting like a “broken record” when it’s in response to something just as repetitive. This was also my point when talking about Elon Musk who you refer to as a Nazi, as well as the things after that you accuse me of, with the slur against trans people having been apologized for two years ago (with the person I said it to being on good terms with me still) because I didn’t know the name of a fictional race from One Piece could ever be a slur.
Removed by mod
Here is a challenge for you. Point to where I said anything about a shooter. You are quite literally making stuff up, using a relic of a past conversation that doesn’t 100% accurately relay what was going on. If I apologize for something I did towards someone and the person forgives me, that’s their choice, not yours. One piece of “evidence” provided years ago does not show one’s whole true self in the present.
Removed by mod
Again, point to where I said anything about a shooter. Do it.
What I said at the time to my friend was ungraceful. I apologized. We made up. We have been friends for years ever since then, and he has condemned people lately for using what he says is proof taken without his authorization. I even recently wished him a happy birthday, it was three days ago.