• polle@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m all for less bloat ware, but come one. The camera app or remote desktop are the least shitty ones. Its borderline to call them even bloatware.

    • Piers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be clear, they seem to be saying that those apps will still be preinstalled. They’ll just be easier to uninstall if you want to do so.

      "option for the first time to uninstall the Camera app, Cortana app, Photos app, People app, and the Remote Desktop client. "

      • Prox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I thought they dropped support for Cortana. Is she back (maybe as “The Weapon”)?

      • Skyline@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, having the option is not a bad thing. Nothing changes for those who use the apps or want them there, but it lets people remove them if that’s what they want.

    • ech0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My issue is the Solitaire and games. We have Win11 for Business (Switching to Enterprise soon) and I have to run a powershell script during Intune/oobe to rip out all the bloat.

    • hayes_@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean I’ve never used either of those apps and my computer doesn’t even have a camera.

      Sounds like textbook bloatware to me… 🤷‍♀️

        • beachcamp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Bloatware doesn’t necessarily mean it’s useless, but if even a reasonable percent of people don’t want or need it or shouldn’t be preinstalled. That’s bloatware.

          • obscura_max@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            For bloatware to be a meaningful term, I think it needs to go beyond just some arbitrary percent of users don’t need or use it. For an OS, having baseline apps which are useful across a wide variety of hardware setups and use cases is reasonable, even if they don’t apply in your particular situation. Bloat would be superfluous apps that replicate baseline features or baseline apps that have grown in scope beyond what’s strictly necessary.

          • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Remote desktop and camera apps are pretty primary pieces of functionality, whether or not you use or need them. Windows is bloated garbage in general but those apps are not really a part of that imo… I don’t know if there’s really a precise definition of bloatware but I sort of think of it mostly as something that takes up your system resources rather than just hard drive space. Something that runs all or most of the time even though it doesn’t actually provide much value

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s bloat because a lot of people will never make use of it, so it’s taking up more space (bloating it) for no appreciable gain. It should be easy to install if you do want to make use of it, but not literally every piece of software should be installed just because some people will use it.

          It coming pre-installed is also harmful to third parties. Many will just choose the MS version because it’s already there, rather than potentially find another group who’s made similar (maybe even better) software for the same purpose.

    • bean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreement. But they are not removing them so much as adding the option to uninstall them right? So functionally it’s thereof needed still.

    • xubu@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      RDC could be a good option to uninstall for businesses where the machine acts as a terminal and you don’t want those devices launching RDC to begin with Not sure why it hasn’t been allowed already.