All I’ve been able to find are cherry picked words and sentences the police tell the press in both’s attempts to spin it for their narratives.

Is it foolish to hope the public will get to read it in its relative entirety (a word or a name redacted is understandable, not entire paragraphs) in less than years or decades?

Legal process is a blindspot for me, I don’t know what they’re able to have as evidence that they can also keep from the public eye if they wish.

  • garretble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    I read it yesterday from a link a friend shared - if it is the right document, that is. It seems like it is.

    And it’s what you expect: insurance screwed over his mom, and then him, so that plus a lot of stuff he was reading radicalized him to do what he did.

    • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      This, again, picks a few words and phrases from it, instead of linking it.

      This does not answer OP’s question, quite the opposite so.