• Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    We are going in circles. Short sentence on what you think I need to admit to. This shouldn’t be difficult.

    • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      You need to admit that you aren’t a very intelligent person. You literally couldn’t even figure out that 4.5 times 9 equals 40.5. That’s basic fucking arithmetic dude, it’s like I’m trying to explain this shit to an 8 year old.

      You need to admit that the Sackler case provides zero evidence of judicial corruption.

      You need to admit that you are wrong.

      • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        I tried to keep the discussion somewhat measured.

        And yet you come up with “Admit you are wrong and stupid!” What? How? What is going through that head of yours? Are you a teenager? Do you really expect anyone to go through with this?

        I guess it’s on me that I expected something different.

        You can fuck righ off, you shit eating lemming!

        • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          You tried to keep the discussion measured??? You never responded to a single one of my points!

          In my very first comment, I made a number of points. You ignored them. I copied them into another comment and you ignored them again. I rephrased them and you ignored them again. You’re not engaging in good faith, you’re just ignoring everything that comes out of my mouth because you have no idea how to respond.

        • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrington_v._Purdue_Pharma_L.P.)

          The very first thing you said was about the Sackler case and how the ruling wasn’t fair. The first thing I responded was that the Supreme Court already overturned that ruling. And after like 5 more comments I still have no idea if you are even aware that the ruling was overturned. You never once acknowledged reading that or clicking the hyperlink

          (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrington_v._Purdue_Pharma_L.P.)

          • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            My man… the fuck that supreme court had to over turn the ruling is the evidence of corruption.

            WTF is u larping pedo celebs and regime around here for?