• superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    Counterpoint: Liking a woman’s body the way it naturally is shouldn’t be considered a fetish.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’d call it a fetish if you are more attracted to feet than primary or secondary sexual organs.

        • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Why you hatin’ on tertiary and quaternary characteristics?

          Body hair growth is triggered by hormonal changes, so body hair could be considered a sexual maturity adjacent characteristic.

          Do you also consider a woman’s preference for non-hairy guys to be an abnormal fetish?

          What about butts? They’re not (biologically) sexual organs, any more than mouths are; do you consider the admiration of butts to be a fetish?

          Why do you include breasts (I assume these are your secondary organs?) as in the “not a fetish” list? They have nothing to do with the passing of gametes; they’re only valuable long after the sex act.

          Your taxonomy seems rather arbitrary.