Non-goals

Does not have to support the runtime installation of kernel modules. This will prevent the out-of-the-box installation of, for example:

  • Proprietary NVIDIA kernel driver (NVIDIA GPUs must either be new enough to use the open-source kernel modules that can be distributed in-tree, or else use Nouveau)
  • VirtualBox (requires out-of-tree modules; QEMU/KVM probably do a better job anyway)
  • Vendor-specific VPNs that require custom out-of-tree kernel modules that cannot be redistributed with the kernel due to license incompatibility

Does not have to support the use case of developing low-level system components like the kernel, drivers, systemd, etc., as this can be troublesome with an immutable base OS.

Does this part mean there will also be no support for ZFS?

  • Leaflet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    17 days ago

    If they’re not including the proprietary Nvidia driver, they’re definitely not including ZFS.

    • lnxtx@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 days ago

      Neutral. I’m just curious how it will work. Comparing with Debian/Ubuntu as a base.

      • Justin@lemmy.kde.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 days ago

        Debain/Ubuntu are always a little behind on library and Qt versions etc. For example with KDE Neon on an LTS they had to overlay/patch many libraries which ended up breaking most of the Qt applications that users could install from the Ubuntu repo. Arch is almost always up to date with the latest stable releases of libraries and Qt making it an ideal base for KDE Plasma which is a fast moving desktop.

        • beleza pura@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          Arch is almost always up to date with the latest stable releases of libraries and Qt making it an ideal base for KDE Plasma which is a fast moving desktop.

          are you involved in this project? i have a little bit of a gripe with this approach. unless your idea is to aim this os at enthusiasts instead of the general public, the user should not have to worry about large upgrades that might leave the system in a broken state. this is why debian is always a little behind: making sure a bunch of different components in a million possible different combinations all work well together is hard work and it takes time. i’m not even saying it’s not possible to use a rolling release model and have a user friendly distro (opensuse tumbleweed does it pretty well), but reliability comes before software recency imo.

          edit: btw this is why i said i’m unsure making an os is the job of application developers. what’s ideal for the developers might not be ideal for users.

          • Justin@lemmy.kde.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 days ago

            Yes I am involved in the project. As for not worrying about large system upgrades, things break, no matter how much testing you do on them. For running KDE I prefer to run the latest, it has the least bugs and the newest features.

            There will be at minimum 3 editions of this OS, one for developers and those who love to live on the bleeding edge, one for enthusiasts and one for general users. The one for general users will be well tested and aim to have zero showstopping bugs.

      • megane-kun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        For whatever it’s worth, I use (up until fairly recently) KDE Plasma on Arch, and it’s pretty much fine. There’s some hiccups especially after a big update such as KDE Plasma 6, but it’s a smooth ride so far.

        If the KDE Plasma developers support an Arch-based distro of their own, and package stuff for this distro with care, I think it’d be a better experience, but I am guessing not by much compared to KDE Plasma on base Arch.

  • beleza pura@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 days ago

    although this is cool, i’m a little on the fence, as i’m still not sure if it’s the job of application/desktop developers to create an os.

    also, last i heard, nouveau doesn’t get commits for about a year now. support is pretty hit or miss. my graphics card is one of the best supported by nouveau and it works pretty well but it will freeze at least once a day, which is why i had to stick to the proprietary driver

      • beleza pura@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GK208B [GeForce GT 710] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])

        pretty old gpu, but some cheapo graphics cards, especially in brazil, are still being sold brand new with gpus around the same age.

        • Justin@lemmy.kde.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          Ah yes. I used to have a GTX 1060 and was pretty pissed off when they said the new open source driver would only support from 1660 onwards (or is it 1630)…

  • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 days ago

    I think dropping loadable module support would severely limit what users can do when a driver misbehaves or doesn’t handle a particular device as well as an (in-tree) alternative.

    Also, I wonder how they expect to achieve being “The KDE operating system” or “doesn’t break” when their existing distro has been more than a little rocky so far. Who do they think will do the long-term work of raising and maintaining the quality bar?

    It would be kool to have a solid reference distro where Plasma could shine, especially for organisations and newer users who don’t know how to replace GNOME on existing distros. But this proposal gives me the impression that they underestimate the effort required, so I am skeptical.

    • Justin@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      The existing distro Neon has issues generally because of their choice to use Ubuntu LTS as a base. This is because KDE Plasma needs newer libraries usually than Ubuntu LTS can provide so they add newer libraries in their repository which often breaks existing apps in the Ubuntu repository. Having to patch and bring newer libraries all the time takes its toll. Basing it on Arch means they’ll almost always have the latest libraries ready to go.

      • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        The existing distro Neon has issues generally because of their choice to use Ubuntu LTS as a base. This is because KDE Plasma needs newer libraries usually than Ubuntu LTS can provide

        In other words, they don’t have enough resources dedicated to doing it well. This is part of the problem I described.

        Basing it on Arch means they’ll almost always have the latest libraries ready to go.

        That could reduce the work required in one area, but would increase it in another. Arch fails the “doesn’t break” goal on its own, which means someone would have to do more work if they want to achieve it.

        • Justin@lemmy.kde.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          In other words, they don’t have enough resources dedicated to doing it well.

          No they’re resourced quite fine, trying to mash old with new is never going to smooth.

          That could reduce the work required in one area, but increase it in another. Arch fails the “doesn’t break” goal on its own, which means someone would have to do more work to achieve it.

          And that’s why they have each release as it’s own btrfs subvolume, if it breaks, you roll back, done. There will be 3 (maybe 4) variants and users will be encouraged to run the “stable” variant which is managed as a snapshot in time deployment where KDE Linux and KDE devs together agree that the system is stable and has 0 critical/showstopper bugs.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 days ago

    Yah, nobody with 5 minutes of KVM under their belt would bother with Virtualbox.

  • funtrek@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    One important thing is missing: SELinux. This should be included right from the start if you want maximum security.