• iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The trial hinged on the following 17 seconds, which saw the Audi reverse a short distance, hitting an unmarked car behind, then accelerate forward, reaching an estimated 12mph before colliding with the BMW and a parked Tesla.

    Armed officers were heard shouting “go, go, go” and “armed police, get out of the f***ing car,” as they surrounded the vehicle, in footage played in court.

    The Audi then reversed at 8mph, hitting the unmarked Volvo behind, and was stationary as Mr Blake pulled the trigger of his carbine less than a second later

    Some context for people who won’t click the article

    • Tedesche@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Police consider a moving vehicle a deadly weapon. Thus, if you’re trying to flee from them by driving, especially in an erratic manner, you’re considered to be wielding a deadly weapon and they can thereby respond with lethal force.

      Agree or disagree, this is the logic.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Even calling it logic is pushing it.

        “Pretense”, “excuse”, or “bloodlust-induced delusion” would be more accurate.

        By that “logic”, they’d be justified in murdering every single motorist for at some point swerving unexpectedly.