China's increasing passport controls evoke Mao era
www.voanews.com
Some teachers, civil servants and executives of state-owned enterprises were ordered to hand in their passports
  • partial_accumen@lemmy.worldEnglish
    4·
    3 hours ago

    The Chinese government has been acting to restrict travel outside the country by ordering some teachers, civil servants and executives of state-owned enterprises to hand in their passports.

    …and…

    Hong said the CCP is also worried that as people’s confidence in the economy slows, they will become less loyal to Xi’s regime and China’s system, and that personnel and capital will flee the country.

    Won’t this action by the CCP actually accelerate the rate at which people leave? If they currently have a passport and are seeing people they know get their passports seized, those still with passports might choose to leave now while they still can even if they hadn’t considered it before.

    • RagingHungryPanda@lemm.eeEnglish
      1·
      2 hours ago

      You’d think, but maybe not. One thing that China does is it’s really strict on not letting people bring money out of the country. I have friends that have money back home that they can’t get out of the country.

      The main reason for that is that when the gov’t opens that up, billions start flowing out of the country really fast. So, if you leave, you’re leaving your money behind.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        1 hour ago

        You’re referring to capital controls, and yes, China has strict controls on how much money you can move out of the country. I’m referring to people themselves. If you have a valid passport right now, you can still get yourself out legally. Most of your money may have to stay behind, but that could be worth it for many situations.

        • InverseParallax@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          1 hour ago

          The problem is: People know if they leave, their money will probably be taken.

          They’re gambling with their lives, but that’s a fair gamble for the stakes.

  • RagingHungryPanda@lemm.eeEnglish
    21·
    2 hours ago

    Also, this is an account that’s 1 day old with 64 posts on news articles and doesn’t appear to be marked as a bot.

    • angrystego@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      49 minutes ago

      I would like to point out that while the account is not marked as a bot, it IS marked as a Dot.

    • Dot.@feddit.orgOPEnglish
      21·
      2 hours ago

      So… What are you looking for here exactly?

      Also where did you bring that number from, I do not post only in this community?

      • RagingHungryPanda@lemm.eeEnglish
        11·
        2 hours ago

        Oh, you’re a person. My bad. I thought with so many posts in such a short time that it was a bot.

        Edit: it’s not a big deal. There’s a setting to mark an account as a bot. So I was more looking for that.

        Edit 2. Here’s where I got the number from

        • Dot.@feddit.orgOPEnglish
          2·
          2 hours ago

          No problem brother.

          I just want to contribute here, as Lemmy does not seem active.