I hear that a lot but, how bad is it really? Does it affect you (if you use Debian)? Aren’t there ways to install newer versions of most things that actually matter?
You must log in or register to comment.
As a someone who has used both Arch, and Debian, neither has less or more bugs.
Debian has the same bugs, over the period of their stable release, and Arch has changing bugs (like a new set every update lol).
Yes, Arch is going to get a lot more features. But it comes at the cost of “instability”. Which is not so much a lack of reliability but instead, how much the software changes. I remember a firefox bug that caused a crash when I attempt to drag bookmarks in my bookmarks bar around, which lasted for like a week — then it went away.
The idea behind projects like Debian, is that for an entity that needs stability, you can simply work around the bugs, since you always know what and where they are. (Well, the actual intent is that entities write patches and submit them to Debian to fix the bugs but no one does that).
Another thing: Debian Stable has more up to date packages than Ubuntu 20.04, and Ubuntu 22.04. This happens because Ubuntu “freezes” a Sid version, and those packages don’t get major updates for a while. So often, the latest Debian stable has newer packages than the older Ubuntu releases.
That helps put it into perspective. That’s not nearly as out of date as people make it seem.
@JackbyDev The “Out of date” is good for a server, as long as security patches are backported (debian does this). Out of date is not good for a desktop. I want to get the new releases of the Window Manager, office suite, browser, etc.
Out of date is not good for a desktop.
Some call it out of date, others call it stable. If you want your computer to simply work as you are used to and to not bother you with new features and bugs, Debian is a nice distro for Desktop as well.
“To simply work” relies on a specific use case.
A relative of mine used to do music on Linux and often compiled obscure software for music production from Github. Debian and even some Ubuntu derivatives sometimes lacked the required build chain versions.
When your use case relies on using some most up to date software, then Debian (stable) obviously is not the distro of choice. But that case is not what I meant with ‘simply work’, i.e. using the same (major) version of software for several years.
That’s exactly why Debian is my go to.
It’s the same for me.
Debian 13 has 69% of packages up to date: https://repology.org/repositories/statistics Years ago I used Mint and was annoyed by the outdated packages, so I used the nix package manager. But after a few Months I switched completely to nixos.
nice?
This is always a spectrum from how long it was since the last Debian stable release. So about 2 years max.
Modern release cadences make it crazy anywhere but Debian, but security patches are very timely. If you’re dealing with newer features, driver support or java/npm packages you’re probably also outside the typical defaults, but there’s generally some people working to keep the common ones up to date.
Still not my preferred way to handle updates and in some cases… kind of abusive to the maintainers who constantly haVE to deal with bug reports from “out of date” Debian users. The xscreensaver maintainer has some choice words. But it works, has for years with no sign of slowing.
I’ve had hard drives be too new for the Debian kernel. Granted it was a VERY fancy hard drive, but… Ever since that I’ve been leaning Fedora, but Fedora 40 is awful, so I’m considering trying Debian as my preferred distro again in the future.
I’ve found that arch is often an easier time than fedora if you want “up-to-date” Linux. Fedora has its heart in the right place, but its pathological adherence to open source makes it sometimes a very difficult time for certain classes of new things.
But as I have opinions as to my lawn and your location relative to it, Debian is more often fine for my needs. It’s my daily driver on pretty much everything at work and at home, with the exception of a few arch and fedora systems in my home lab.
I was perfectly happy with Fedora when I switched to it on 32 up to 39, but this pulseaudio/pipewire crap is just like… Shades of my audio drivers never just working on Windows 95. Additionally, beyond it adding weird audio delays and pauses, if not outright breaking audio on my intel systems, it causes all kinds of non-audio bugs on both of my AMD systems, gnome-shell will just suddenly race to like 20-30% CPU use and the UI LOCKS. On the desktop AMD, it’s always momentary, but on the laptop, it’s a solid half second and happens way more often, but it’s entirely resolved if I connect certain HDMI monitors (I assume having that as a possible output avoids whatever race condition causes this BS). At any rate, exactly the sort of finicky, mysterious, no good fix I can find crap that made me abandon proprietary OSes, so if this isn’t completely fixed in 41, I’ll definitely be trying out other options.
Ah… Yikes 😬
It’s easy to backport newer software to Debian stable: https://wiki.debian.org/SimpleBackportCreation#Install_Debian_packaging_tools
I had to do this with transmission-daemon when the stable version had a nasty memory leak. I use Debian on all my secondary computers, the ones where I don’t need the newest software and don’t want to fuck with it and have it break.
Depends on what you do.
If you’re just browsing, and doing casual stuff, it’s not really noticeable. It’s perfect for the less technically oriented because nothing changes for years.
I’ve been using MX for about a year now, but I definitely wouldn’t have without flatpak and nix. I need packages that aren’t years out of date, so they’re all installed through nix home-manager.
The benefit of this combo is that while user packages might break, the system itself will be predictable for the next few years. That means no new bugs, but also that minor issues won’t be solved.
Yeah it’s pretty out of date. You might then “eh that doesn’t matter, I like things to be stable and I’ll just imagine I’m three years in the past”.
That works until some software introduces a bug fix or a new feature that you really need and you can’t use it because of your distro’s weird update policies.
You will very quickly find that you don’t care anywhere near as much about theoretical stability as you do about a concrete feature or bugfix that is available but inaccessible.
I say theoretical because in practice Debian stable isn’t really much more stable than more up-to-date distros. It just has fewer new bugs and more old bugs.
They might try to claim they backport fixes for the old bugs, but in reality they don’t have the manpower to do that for 100k packages or whatever it is. They do it for critical bugs of very important packages but that’s it.
i couldn’t install a minecraft server because java in the repos was too old.
Minetest
Yeah that game is great! Can you self host a multiplayer server though?
Adoptium (formerly AdoptOpenJDK) is a good place to get Java builds. https://adoptium.net/marketplace/?os=linux
Thanks! I think I added the openjdk repo and installed that way, can’t really remember. I’ll have to keep adoptium in mind
If you’re not a Java dev (and don’t see it often) a good way to remember it is that “adopt openjdk” was the original name of the project when Oracle changed their terms back in 2019. The idea was to get people to “adopt” openjdk instead of Oracle jdk. The name of the project changed due to trademarks but it’ll get you close enough when you search for it lol.
I’ve been on debian stable for quite a while, it hasn’t been an issue yet.
If it’s something that needs to stay updated I use flatpaks which are usually available nowadays.
What do you mean by “out of date” exactly?
Not new
Not new
And what do you mean by “new” exactly?
It’s really a vibe. I see people complaining about it all the time about Debian, so I’d expect those people to answer based on their own definition of new/old and talk about problems (or lack of) it’s brought them.
So then your original question isn’t ‘How “out of date” is Debian really?’ but ‘If you complain that Debian is “out of date”, what do you mean?’
I mean, isn’t that how communication works? “Has the heat outside affected you?” It doesn’t matter what I consider hot and they consider hot, I’m asking if the heat affects them. “If the heat outside is hot enough that it has bothered you, has it affected you negatively?” It’s a mouthful.
No. Heat affects everyone. Regarding Debian, what exactly do you think has affected everyone?
I don’t think I can make this clearer for you. Pretty much everyone else seems to have understood the question. You’re going to need to figure this one out on your own. Good luck!
It’s so out of date that Deb and Ian are no longer together
(…this is actually true, not just a joke)
I assume that’s where the name came from given the context. Never knew that.
Yep, learned it recently from a list of things that are, surprisingly, named after real people. Deb and Ian eventually got married but are now divorced.
For a server? I want it out of date, so long as “out of date” means “older versions with backported security patches”.
I’m boring and don’t care about the new whizzy crap, because if it’s working now and it’s secure, I’m not touching it. There is no feature you can offer me that will make me want to update a stable working server, so don’t screw with what version of software I’m running.
For desktop use? Give me KDE Plasma 6.2 right now, not three years from now. I need that new shit in my veins, so hurry the hell up.
So I mostly use Debian stable on anything server-y, and Fedora on anything desktop-y.
And, I posted this just a few days ago, but I don’t like, at all, going outside of distro repos on Debian for packages.
You end up with dependency chain issues in dpkg/apt, because dpkg is super hyper prone to them anyways, and have installs you can’t easily just update or upgrade because it can’t figure out what in the hell you’ve done to it.
So I just uh, don’t use 3rd party repos for updated versions of things unless it’s utterly critical to do so and/or accept that at some point I’m doing a clean install for a migration because shit will be so broken you can’t pull it to the current stable version because of the 3rd party software.
If you’re a software developer or an enthusiast, you’ll notice it immediately. You’ve been reading and hearing about the new release of the BestThingEver 3.14, and you’re totally hyped up about it. You rush to install BTE to experience how awesome it is only to find out that the Debian repos still have a BTE 2.0.5 and none of the cool new features everyone has been talking about for the last 6 months.
Oh, that didn’t sound familiar? If you can’t tell the difference between two versions of a particular application, Debian will be perfectly fine for you.
Hobbiest Dev, I run Debian as my daily. Flatpak and distrobox take care of everything for me.
Debian ships a new release every 2 years.
You can use flatpak to get the latest apps. If you need the latest CLI software use containers. The entire point of Debian is to have a solid base system to build off of.
the more software you install, that is not in the standard repo, the more unstable it will become…
i use a rolling release distro on my desktop, void btw.
on servers i use debian, because i want the software as reliable as possible. i don’t care if the packages are older as long as no update breaks the system…
