• venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      My comment was meaning to say that the only people who can put laws in place to stop politicians from being able to participate in trading stocks are politicians.

      Clearly the laws in place do not stop them currently.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I follow, but that’s not correct. The laws are already preventing them from insider trading. The SEC is not holding them accountable. More laws won’t change the lack of enforcement. Pressing the SEC to do their job is the solution.

        • binomialchicken@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          There is no reason to worry about enforcement of insider trading, after a law is passed to prevent them from holding any stocks at all (except maybe index funds)

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Sure, ideally. While we’re waiting for a 2/3 congressional majority, wouldn’t it make sense to focus on getting the SEC to hold them accountable to the laws that are already in place?