In my humble opinion, the Technology community should only contain text news/articles or even news pictures.

I simply think that tech videos does not belong to this community, as there is already a videos community which would be more suitable for this.

What does the mods think about this?

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    My main beef is that I don’t enjoy watching video form content, but having a summary would be more than sufficient to quickly determine whether or not I would be interested in watching anyway.

    Strongly agree.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      a summary would be more than sufficient to quickly determine whether or not I would be interested in watching anyway.

      That’s what the headlien is for.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s a good idea in principle but headlines are often not in the viewer’s interest. The purpose is to get you to watch the video, not to actually tell you what’s in the video.

        Unfortunately there’s lots of good videos with Clickbait titles.

        • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          There’s a lot terrible articles with clickbate titles too. A lot of the articles I’m interested reading are either clickbate/ragebait or way out of context or just completely false.

          • henfredemars@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Absolutely. That’s why it’s still good practice to include some kind of comment about the article in the post if the content isn’t clearly identified by the headline.

          • woelkchen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            There’s a lot terrible articles with clickbate titles too.

            The headline here does not need to be the same as the headline in the article. Other communities have rules not to editorialize headlines, this community does not. “Review of tech gadget X by outlet Y” is a perfectly fine headline here.

          • howrar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Much faster to skim the contents of an article than a video.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The purpose is to get you to watch the video, not to actually tell you what’s in the video.

          There is no rule here to copy the video title into the submission headline. The submission here could be titled “PlayStation 5 Pro benchmarks by Digital Foundry”, no matter how DF names the video on YouTube. Demanding summaries of videos that can easily be longer than 45 minutes is just not reasonable at all.