CritiGalDesist∞@lemmygrad.ml to Shit Reactionaries Say@lemmygrad.ml · 1 year agoI want to put them under ground!!!lemmygrad.mlimagemessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up162arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up158arrow-down1imageI want to put them under ground!!!lemmygrad.mlCritiGalDesist∞@lemmygrad.ml to Shit Reactionaries Say@lemmygrad.ml · 1 year agomessage-square40fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMurvel@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·1 year agoSure is a crazy question, right, so I’ll just move on.
minus-squareComradeSalad@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 year agoAnd you are a spineless and hypocritical lib. What’s wrong with being logically consistent? You scared or something?
minus-squareMurvel@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·1 year agoYou commies are rich, but for sure I’ll humor you. What was the thing that you found not to be ‘logically consistent’(illogical as you would normally say).
minus-squareDirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-21 year agoAnswer their question first. They asked you something first.
minus-squareMurvel@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoSo nothing, thanks very constructive. They claimed their question was a crazy tangent, I agreed since I don’t know what it had to do with anything so I kinda ignored it, there done.
Sure is a crazy question, right, so I’ll just move on.
And you are a spineless and hypocritical lib.
What’s wrong with being logically consistent? You scared or something?
You commies are rich, but for sure I’ll humor you. What was the thing that you found not to be ‘logically consistent’(illogical as you would normally say).
Answer their question first. They asked you something first.
So nothing, thanks very constructive.
They claimed their question was a crazy tangent, I agreed since I don’t know what it had to do with anything so I kinda ignored it, there done.